Asking Eric: Domestic abuse survivor wants to keep son from dangerous patterns

Dear Eric: I stayed successful an abusive matrimony for excessively long, and for a wide assortment of reasons, including that we needed my ex’s income and wellness security to screen chronic aesculapian needs.

My now-adult lad does not cognize the grade of the maltreatment successful my matrimony due to the fact that I hid it. Regardless, helium is 3 times much apt to go an abuser himself simply due to the fact that helium grew up successful an abusive home.

Sadly, I person heard him berate and insult his beauteous woman aggregate times. I person made gentle corrections to him pursuing his comments. The past clip was astatine a vacation household gathering. I instantly stated that I spent years readying connected leaving his begetter due to the fact that of akin treatments, and that I knew helium could beryllium a amended antheral and husband. I stated that his woman deserves to beryllium treated with kindness and respect always.

I bash not privation to beryllium a buttinsky into idiosyncratic else’s marriage, but I bash not privation to beryllium by silently frankincense perpetuating different procreation of abuse/domestic violence. Will I beryllium retired of measurement to person a backstage speech with my cherished daughter-in-law and past my son? Please, assistance maine to respectfully genitor my big son.

– Mindful Momma

Dear Momma: Your instincts are perfectly correct. You’re successful a unsocial presumption to marque a quality arsenic your son’s parent and a subsister of abuse. This isn’t meddling; it’s brave and liable parenting.

Furthermore, your guidance tin assistance steer your lad from unsafe learned and observed behavior, arsenic good arsenic protecting your daughter-in-law. As you good know, having idiosyncratic extracurricular of the matrimony who tin connection support, extortion and resources volition immeasurably assistance your daughter-in-law. It tin besides assistance your lad to find a pathway to getting assistance for himself. If you’re looking for ways to commencement the conversations, the National Domestic Violence Hotline (thehotline.org) has a wealthiness of resources. You tin besides hunt for home unit involution programs successful your area.

You don’t person a work to “save” your son. However, your tendency to connection your contented is invaluable. Please, person the conversations that consciousness harmless for you and besides speech with a counsellor oregon trusted person astir the emotions this brings up for you.

Dear Eric: I americium the aunt to 2 astonishing young people. I person ever been a large portion of their lives, particularly erstwhile my member and their ma divorced. When each of them was born, I opened a savings relationship successful their names and person been steadily adding wealth successful each month.

Five years ago, my member joined a beauteous pistillate with 2 kids of her own, who we person welcomed wholeheartedly into our family.

My nephew is 17 and is applying to colleges and my 16-year-old niece volition beryllium doing the aforesaid adjacent year. I ever intended the wealth to spell to college, oregon a car/house if they chose not to spell to college. When I mentioned giving my nephew the wealth for assemblage to my member and sister-in-law, she said she thinks the wealth should beryllium divided arsenic among the 4 kids.

Now, look, I similar her kids. But my niece, nephew and I person a peculiar bond, and they person gone done a batch successful their lives. I consciousness similar they shouldn’t person to stock this peculiar gift. I hatred what wealth tin bash to relationships. What bash you think?

– Don’t Want to Share

Dear Share: Agh, money. You’re right: it tin make unspeakable situations, particularly successful families. But ultimately, wealth doesn’t teardrop families apart; people’s behaviour and unmanaged emotions do.

Frankly, you tin and should bash immoderate you privation with the money. I recognize your sister-in-law’s interest for the futures of her kids, but I privation she’d framed it much arsenic a petition or, amended yet, worked with your member to assistance her kids negociate immoderate emotions astir the gift.

However, it whitethorn beryllium champion for the attraction of your narration to deliberation astir originative solutions. The ages of your sister-in-law’s kids mightiness beryllium a origin – if they’re younger and not headed to assemblage close away, possibly giving the bulk to your brother’s kids and investing the remainder for the different kids is simply a blessed medium.

The magnitude of wealth is besides thing to consider. Is this capable wealth to screen each of the tuition? Or is it an magnitude that’s meaningful but wouldn’t meaningfully assistance with assemblage if divided 4 ways?

In the end, though, this is your acquisition to bash with arsenic you please. Any relatives of your sister-in-law’s kids tin besides bash arsenic they please. You wouldn’t beryllium depriving your sister-in-law’s kids by not giving them a acquisition they weren’t expecting. But it whitethorn prevention you a headache to see immoderate alternatives earlier doing what you privation and person each close to do.

(Send questions to R. Eric Thomas astatine eric@askingeric.com oregon P.O. Box 22474, Philadelphia, PA 19110. Follow him connected Instagram and motion up for his play newsletter astatine rericthomas.com.)

©2025 Tribune Content Agency, LLC.