Asking Eric: Friend still speaking to her ex, despite his mistreatment

Dear Eric: Several months ago, a friend’s fellow broke up with her. She is devastated implicit this arsenic she loves him precise much. Even though helium treated her precise poorly by saying she is anserine and is an embarrassment, she inactive loves him.

She continues to talk to him, adjacent helping him out. She calls maine to archer of the latest hurtful concern helium has done. I person told her I wouldn’t tolerate being progressive with a antagonistic idiosyncratic similar that, but she can’t bring herself to chopped ties with him.

I’m frustrated with the continuing “woe is me” conversations. She doesn’t look to beryllium capable to determination on, which is precise hard for maine to perceive the aforesaid sob communicative implicit and over. Any proposal would beryllium greatly appreciated.

– Frustrated Friend

Dear Friend: It’s OK to acceptable a bound present and instrumentality to it. Tell her thing like: “I emotion you, I attraction astir you and I can’t basal by portion you get hurt. It’s not your fault; your ex-boyfriend is mistreating you. But erstwhile we speech astir you continuing to prosecute with him, I get frustrated due to the fact that thing changes and you merit better. So, I can’t speech astir him with you anymore. Remember that I’m present to assistance you astatine immoderate time, but rehashing the past atrocious happening helium did doesn’t enactment for me.”

Dear Eric: My spouse precocious died, leaving maine with a important fiscal estate. Now I person to determine what to bash with it.

We had nary children (we were a antheral couple). My spouse had 3 younger brothers, 2 of them inactive living, and I consciousness person to those 2 than to immoderate of my ain relations (I americium an lone child).

The youngest member and I person been friends for years, and helium has 2 children and 2 grandchildren, each of whom I americium precise fond of. I americium earnestly considering leaving a ample portion of my property to that brother’s children and grandchildren. The oldest member is childless.

The occupation is the long-deceased 3rd brother, with whom I was not close. I person ne'er had a bully narration with his widow, and I person a affable but not adjacent narration with each of his 3 children.

Meanwhile, the youngest brother’s children person ever called maine “Uncle” and pass with maine regularly. The children of the different member ne'er pass with me.

If they weren’t my spouse’s nieces, I would person nary narration with them astatine all. But I americium acrophobic astir perchance causing problems wrong my spouse’s household by favoring 1 brother’s household with important bequests and ignoring the different family.

I fishy that if my spouse had survived me, helium would person divided the bequests overmuch much arsenic among each of his brothers’ children. However, it is my wealth now, and I don’t truly privation to springiness it to radical toward whom I consciousness nary existent warmth.

I besides expect from acquisition that successful my aged age, I volition beryllium capable to beryllium connected the 1 member and his household to willingly assistance me, careless of whether they inherit thing from maine oregon not. Any suggestions of what to bash erstwhile I conscionable with my lawyer to marque the will?

– Uncle Dilemma

Dear Uncle: I’m atrocious for the nonaccomplishment of your spouse. I’m gladsome that you person household to thin on. I’m besides gladsome that you’re readying to speech to a nonrecreational who tin look astatine the ineligible and fiscal specifics of your concern and counsel you.

We can’t power what radical bash with bequests oregon however families react. So, if your nieces, with whom you aren’t close, consciousness immoderate entitlement to an inheritance from you, that’s connected them to woody with.

You’re deciding based connected your affectional world and the relationships that you have, which is perfectly fair. Ideally, bequests shouldn’t beryllium seen arsenic “repayment” for familial kindness, but they’re besides not owed simply due to the fact that you spot each different astatine the holidays.

I’m funny astir your suspicion that your spouse would person divided things much equally. That’s thing that you should drill down on. Why would helium person done that? Do you consciousness you beryllium it to him to grant that wish?

If so, it whitethorn assistance you to deliberation of your volition arsenic a reflection of some of your values and divided the difference. On the different hand, if helium had beardown feelings astir the mode the wealth was passed down, possibly helium could person talked it done with you oregon made a proviso successful his ain will.

There’s nary incorrect mode to bash this, but erstwhile you speech to your lawyer, spot your gut and constitute a volition based connected the relationships arsenic they are now, knowing that if things change, you tin set it.

(Send questions to R. Eric Thomas astatine eric@askingeric.com oregon P.O. Box 22474, Philadelphia, PA 19110. Follow him connected Instagram and motion up for his play newsletter astatine rericthomas.com.)

©2025 Tribune Content Agency, LLC.