'Constitutional crisis': The Impoundment Control Act takes center stage amid Russell Vought's confirmation

A powerfulness conflict concerning authorities spending is heating up successful Washington, D.C., igniting what immoderate Senate Democrats telephone a "constitutional crisis" amid the Trump administration’s efforts to curb authorities waste. 

The struggle stems from President Donald Trump's prime to pb the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Russell Vought, and was exacerbated erstwhile the Trump medication announced it would freeze national grants and loans connected Jan. 27 successful an OMB memo. 

Both Trump and Vought stock a communal constituent of contention: the Impoundment Control Act. 

The 1974 law, which Trump and Vought some reason is unconstitutional, reasserts Congress' powerfulness of the purse and bars the enforcement subdivision from unilaterally side-stepping Congress and withholding appropriated funds. 

However, galore ineligible experts pass that the substance is not up for debate, and the courts are clear; it is unconstitutional for the enforcement subdivision to divert dollars Congress has authorized. 

The Senate voted to corroborate Vought connected Thursday by a 53–47 borderline on enactment lines, pursuing a 30-hour hold from Democrats successful protestation against his nomination. 

Republicans assertion that Vought is qualified to pb the section due to the fact that helium antecedently served successful that relation during Trump’s archetypal term. Sen. Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said Wednesday that Vought would "be capable to deed the crushed running."

However, Democrats remained staunchly opposed to Vought's information and claimed his views connected impoundment disqualified him from the role, with Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., arguing connected Wednesday that Trump and Vought judge "they whitethorn beryllium supra the law." 

However, what is the Impoundment Control Act? Here is simply a look astatine what's up for statement regarding authorities spending — and what changes could look during the Trump administration. 

What is the Impoundment Control Act?  

Article I of the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the authorization to negociate the national fund to find backing decisions to equilibrium powerfulness betwixt the branches of government. 

However, the enactment of impoundment occurs erstwhile the enforcement subdivision chooses to not walk these approved dollars from Congress, since the enforcement subdivision and the Office of Budget and Management bash oversee the existent spending of the approved funds. 

Should a president privation to walk little than what Congress has budgeted, the enforcement subdivision indispensable unafraid support from Congress. Deferring funds besides requires the enforcement subdivision to pass Congress. 

As a result, Congress passed the 1974 Impoundment Control Act to found these due channels of legislature oversight if a president chooses to withhold oregon defer these funds. 

‘ULTRA-RIGHT’: TRUMP BUDGET CHIEF PICK RUSSELL VOUGHT FACES FIRE FROM DEM SENATORS

President Donald Trump's nominee for Office of Management and Budget director, Russell Vought, testifies during the Senate Finance Committee information proceeding successful the Dirksen Senate Building connected Jan. 22, 2025 successful Washington, D.C. (Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)

Vought’s opponents voiced interest that his enactment would pb to much cases similar the freeze of national grants and loans disclosed successful an OMB memo connected Jan. 27, a determination that Democrats accidental was amerciable and violated the Impoundment Control Act. 

"As overmuch arsenic Trump desires it, the president is not a king," Senate Budget Committee ranking subordinate Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., told reporters connected Jan. 28. "As overmuch arsenic Trump desires it, a instrumentality is not a suggestion."

"These are not questions of opinion," Merkley said. "These are principles astatine the bosom of our law system. It's astatine the bosom of our checks and balances, and frankincense we person a law crisis."

‘This is Congress’ job'

Vought repeatedly defended his stance that the Impoundment Control Act was unconstitutional successful aggregate confirmation hearings and claimed that presidents historically could walk little than what Congress had earmarked anterior to 1974. 

Proponents of enforcement impoundment often constituent to Thomas Jefferson’s medication successful 1803, erstwhile Congress appropriated backing for 15 gunboats. However, Jefferson held disconnected connected purchasing the boats to not aggravate France amid delicate discussions betwixt then-Secretary of State James Madison and Napoleon. The acquisition of the boats yet became unnecessary pursuing the Louisiana Purchase. 

Additionally, Vought’s Center for Renewing America, a nonprofit Vought founded successful 2021, has said impoundment allows the enforcement subdivision to exert fiscal subject and that the president has the authorization to find if funds are utilized successful the astir businesslike manner. 

Vought did not respond to a petition for remark from Fox News Digital. 

However, according to aggregate ineligible experts, the Constitution and the courts are wide that spending appropriations autumn nether the parameters of the legislative branch. 

Michael McConnell, manager of the Constitutional Law Center astatine Stanford Law School, told Fox News Digital, "The president has the law work to instrumentality attraction that the laws beryllium faithfully executed, and that includes spending.

"So I don't cognize wherever Mr. Vought gets the presumption that someway the president has the close to determine what the authorities is going to walk wealth on," helium said. "This is Congress' job."

Despite Trump and Vought’s views that the Impoundment Control Act is unconstitutional, McConnell said that helium believed determination is "no tenable imaginable that the tribunal is going to hold with that.

"The idiosyncratic who would person been the recipient of the backing volition person immoderate lasting to sue," McConnell said. "So, I would presume that if there's an impoundment, determination volition beryllium an contiguous suit nether the Impoundment Control Act." 

TRUMP TREASURY PICK: EXTENDING TRUMP TAX CUTS ‘SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT ECONOMIC ISSUE’

Russell Vought repeatedly defended his stance that the Impoundment Control Act was unconstitutional successful aggregate confirmation hearings. (Jacquelyn Martin/The Associated Press )

Other ineligible experts agreed that should the Trump medication effort to withhold funds, the courts would measurement successful and asseverate that determination is nary ineligible ground to bash so. 

That is due to the fact that this is not a murky ineligible issue, according to Georgetown Law prof Stephen Vladeck. 

"There are contested issues of law law, but this conscionable isn't 1 of them," Vladeck told Fox News Digital. "Were it otherwise, determination wouldn't beryllium overmuch constituent successful having a legislative branch."

Legal experts assertion the courts historically person upheld the constitutionality of the Impoundment Control Act, and constituent to the 1975 lawsuit Train v. City of New York. In that case, the Supreme Court determined the Environmental Protection Agency indispensable usage afloat backing included successful the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, adjacent though then-President Richard Nixon issued orders not to usage each the funding.

Vought himself admitted successful a Jan. 22 confirmation proceeding that nary tribunal of instrumentality has recovered the Impoundment Control Act unconstitutional. 

Fallout from the OMB memo  

The courts did measurement into enactment pursuing the caller OMB memo outlining a intermission successful national grants and loans, and 2 national judges person temporarily blocked the freeze. 

Although the White House did rescind the memo pausing the national assistance connected Jan. 29, White House property caput Karoline Leavitt said that the determination did not equate to a "rescission of the national backing freeze." 

The White House did not respond to a petition for remark from Fox News Digital connected Vought's information and comments from Democrats that the memo was "illegal." 

The memo did not look to alarm Republican enactment successful Congress, who publically characterized the intermission arsenic modular protocol during an administrative turnover. 

"I deliberation that's a mean signifier astatine the opening of administration, until they person an accidental to reappraisal however the wealth is being spent," Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told reporters connected Jan. 27. "We'll spot benignant of what the grade of it is, and … what they mean to bash successful a much fulsome way. But for now, I deliberation it's just, it's conscionable benignant of a preliminary measurement that I deliberation astir administrations take," Thune said. 

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., besides told reporters connected Jan. 27 the memo did not interest him and that helium "fully" supported it, labeling the directive a "common exertion of communal sense."

Even so, the memo further intensified absorption to Vought’s nomination. Specifically, Democrats urged the full Senate to cull Vought’s information connected Jan. 30 successful response, pursuing a committee ballot advancing his information to the Senate floor. 

Merkely noted that Vought oversaw the OMB successful 2019 erstwhile the bureau held up $214 cardinal successful subject assistance for Ukraine — an contented that emerged arsenic a cardinal constituent successful Trump’s archetypal impeachment. Ultimately, the Government Accountability Office determined successful 2020 the determination did interruption the Impoundment Control Act, up of Trump's Senate impeachment trial. The Senate yet voted to acquit Trump.

Therefore, Merkley characterized Vought arsenic "dangerously unfit" to pb OMB and a "dangerous menace to our law strategy of typical democracy." 

Josh Chafetz, a prof astatine Georgetown Law, said specified connection specified arsenic "constitutional crisis" is tenable considering Congress’s spending powerfulness is 1 of the fewer but captious ways the legislative subdivision ensures the enforcement subdivision doesn’t exert excessively overmuch power. 

"These kinds of impoundments are not conscionable unconstitutional, but they're really anti-constitutional," Chafetz told Fox News Digital. "They onslaught astatine the precise instauration of our law order."

Reform connected the horizon?

Democrats besides don’t judge the caller memo is an isolated incident. Sen. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. cautioned connected Jan. 30 that Vought would question to withhold funds again overseeing OMB — if the Senate confirms him. 

Vought himself signaled the Trump medication could initiate betterment connected impoundment law. In a confirmation proceeding connected Jan. 22, Vought told lawmakers that portion an nonstop strategy is not intact yet, the Trump medication plans to implicit a reappraisal with the Justice Department to research the "parameters of the instrumentality with respect to the Impoundment Control Act," should the Senate corroborate him.

Vought besides noted that immoderate lawmakers who hold with his presumption connected impoundment person projected authorities connected the matter. For example, Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, introduced authorities successful December 2024 to repeal the Impoundment Control Act, arguing that the law’s "unconstitutional limitations" connected the enforcement subdivision person "contributed to a fiscal crisis." 

GET TO KNOW DONALD TRUMP'S CABINET: WHO HAS THE PRESIDENT-ELECT PICKED SO FAR?

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah., antecedently introduced authorities that would repeal the Impoundment Control Act. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

While galore ineligible experts hold the legislative subdivision is the due transmission for reforming the Impoundment Control Act, Chafetz doubts determination is an appetite to bash truthful and that lawmakers connected some sides of the aisle would yet presumption specified attempts arsenic an "attack connected their institution."  

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

As a result, Vladeck said that the Trump medication lone has 2 means to navigate the Impoundment Control Act: either adhere to it oregon modify it. 

"As for what we tin expect going forward, it's wholly imaginable that the medication volition effort to propulsion the envelope," Vladeck said. "But the onus ought to beryllium connected the medication to travel the process Congress and the president agreed to successful 1974 — oregon to marque the lawsuit for wherefore helium shouldn't person to."