6 days ago
4
A Delhi-based lawyer, Tanya Sharma, has publically called retired Uber aft receiving inappropriate messages from a operator soon aft booking a ride. In a LinkedIn station that has since gone viral, Sharma shared screenshots of the messages, describing the acquisition arsenic “traumatic” and raising superior concerns astir women’s safety.
Tanya questioned however specified incidents could hap adjacent successful what she referred to arsenic 1 of Delhi’s “poshest areas”.
“We unrecorded successful the 21st century, and yet things are inactive truthful pathetic and traumatic for radical connected a regular basis. Even an car operator tin harass you successful wide daylight,” she wrote, tagging Uber successful her post.
Tanya explained that she instantly canceled the booking and filed a ailment against the driver. However, she was disappointed with Uber‘s response, which she described arsenic constricted to a “sympathetic message” with nary tangible action. “Is this however it works?” she asked successful the post.
See the post:
The LinkedIn post
Sharma, successful the remark conception of her post, shared an update mentioning Uber’s response, which stated they would get backmost to her wrong 24 to 48 hours. Criticising the delay, she questioned, “What if this aforesaid happening happened to different women during these alleged 48 hours of your policy? Are you acceptable to instrumentality work for my information and the information of different women retired there?”
In a follow-up post, she said Uber banned the operator from its platform. She expressed gratitude for the enactment she received, saying, “Thanks to everyone who supported and shared their experiences. I’m grateful that radical astir maine were really determination for maine successful this situation.” She emphasised the value of taking specified incidents earnestly and raising awareness, adding, “Please escalate specified matters with seriousness and, much importantly, fto others beryllium aware.”
Her station sparked a speech connected LinkedIn, with galore users echoing her concerns astir information and highlighting the value of improved grievance mechanisms.
One idiosyncratic commented, “I booked an Uber today, the operator refused to crook connected the AC and asked maine to get different cab arsenic helium was arsenic rude and carefree of immoderate rules oregon accountability. To my surprise, I was charged astir 60% of the fare arsenic helium started the thrust and marked it arsenic completed. Uber doesn’t assistance the lawsuit successful immoderate mode and drivers cognize this well.”
Another idiosyncratic wrote, “Auto Number, Name of the Driver, FIR some connected the Auto operator and Uber. Uber volition abruptly commencement responding. It’s a shame that these kinds of boys inactive beryllium adjacent aft specified shaming incidents which support happening perpetually successful the country, it seems that precise fewer learn. Furthermore, immoderate of the educated illiterates find this funny.”
.png "indianexpress.")
.png "khaleejtimes")
.png "arabnews")
.png "gulfnews"){kind=logo}
English (US) · 
Hindi (IN) ·