EXPLAINER
Kamala Harris often claims that a Trump medication would interfere with pregnancies. But is that truly true?
By Louis Jacobson | Politifact
Published On 5 Nov 2024
On aggregate occasions successful her closing transportation to voters, Vice President Kamala Harris said her opponent, erstwhile President Donald Trump, would intrude connected women’s pregnancies.
As she denounced Trump’s grounds connected reproductive rights, she said connected October 29 that helium would “force states to show women’s pregnancies”. She urged listeners to “Google Project 2025 and work the plans for yourself”, referring to a blimpish argumentation blueprint assembled by immoderate of Trump’s supporters.
Harris repeated the enactment the pursuing nighttime astatine a rally successful Madison, Wisconsin.
Harris’s connection echoed a akin 1 by her moving mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, who said that Project 2025 would necessitate women to “register with a caller national bureau erstwhile you get pregnant”.
The Harris run again pointed to Project 2025 erstwhile asked for grounds of Harris’s claim.
Project 2025 is simply a argumentation blueprint for the adjacent Republican medication developed by Trump’s allies, including The Heritage Foundation, a blimpish deliberation tank, and astatine slightest 140 radical who worked successful the Trump administration. It is not a Trump run document.
Project 2025 does not telephone connected states oregon the national authorities to show pregnancies from the infinitesimal they are discovered. The program would telephone for much broad monitoring of pregnancies that extremity successful foetal death, specified arsenic abortions, miscarriages and stillbirths, than the US authorities presently requires.
The manual proposes stronger state-based termination information arsenic portion of its broader propulsion to refashion the Health and Human Services Department into a “Department of Life”.
Project 2025 proposes the national authorities withhold wealth from states that bash not study much elaborate termination information to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The papers calls for the Health and Human Services Department to “use each disposable tool, including the cutting of funds”, to guarantee states study the following:
- The fig of abortions wrong their borders.
- The weeks of gestation the termination took place.
- The crushed for the abortion.
- The large woman’s authorities of residence.
- The method of the abortion.
It says these statistic should beryllium separated by category, including spontaneous miscarriage, treatments that incidentally effect successful foetal decease (such arsenic chemotherapy), stillbirths and induced abortion.
Currently, states are not required to taxable termination information to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but the bulk do, but for California, Maryland and New Hampshire. To cod idiosyncratic authorities data, astir authorities captious statistic agencies person designed a signifier that termination providers usage for reporting.
Harris’s statements successful caller days person go little circumstantial and adjacent little close than successful her code astatine the Democratic National Convention. Then, she said Trump “plans to make a nationalist anti-abortion coordinator and unit states to study connected women’s miscarriages and abortions”. That is not true.
Trump has distanced himself from Project 2025 successful caller months, and helium has not called for monitoring gestation outcomes oregon pregnancies broadly.
When Trump was asked successful April whether states should show oregon punish women who person amerciable abortions, Trump said immoderate states “might” take to bash that but maintained that it was up to them.
Our ruling
Harris said Trump would “force states to show women’s pregnancies”.
The assertion is incorrect connected 2 counts. Trump has not projected forcing states to show pregnancies. It is besides not an close depiction of a Project 2025 argumentation proposal.
Project 2025 recommends the national authorities necessitate states to study implicit information connected pregnancies that extremity successful foetal decease and to usage national backing arsenic leverage to guarantee compliance.
This information would bespeak definite gestation outcomes, including abortions, miscarriages and stillbirths. It would not impact the authorities tracking the advancement of each pregnancies from commencement to finish.
The connection is inaccurate. We complaint it false.