Justice Kumar bats for conflict resolution using psychology

During the event, the justice said, “There is 1 peculiar conception successful the codification of civilian procedure, it is Section 89. Courts, lawyers, judges, constabulary volition measurement successful erstwhile the struggle has taken place. But what is this conflict? It is simply a disagreement of ideas. I’ll springiness you a elemental example. A sister demanding a partition of a father’s spot from her brother. She volition accidental look, adjacent though I americium joined and staying with my hubby my begetter has near truthful overmuch spot arsenic a girl I excessively americium entitled nether instrumentality (under Section 6c of the Hindu Succession Act)… I americium entitled to beryllium apportioned a portion of the property. He (the brother) volition accidental nary you are educated, your matrimony was performed… truthful overmuch jewellery was fixed truthful that is equivalent to your share. Then the struggle starts.”

He said, “From determination the struggle goes to court. So each this emanated from struggle of ideas. This is wherever I accidental psychologists tin measurement in. You guarantee that determination is nary dispute, this struggle of ideas doesn’t blossom into a dispute. That is wherefore determination is Section 89 which says that the tribunal indispensable archetypal marque attempts astatine struggle resolution.”

Explaining struggle resolution, helium said, “Which are the 4 methods? Arbitration, Mediation, Lok Adalat and Conciliation. While the archetypal 3 are institutionally recognised, the 4th has not taken signifier arsenic organization recognition. So Mr Bimal Patel (RRU Vice- Chancellor) and the objective science society, I’m putting this arsenic nutrient for thought… The bulk of specified disputes which travel to the constabulary station, you tin spot that they are resolved. There volition beryllium nonaccomplishment ‘in’ effort but determination shouldn’t beryllium nonaccomplishment ‘of’ attempt.”

He added, “If you effort from now, it volition get organization designation possibly 10 years, 20 years down the line, you tin execute this. So isolated from achieving wide simplification successful the pendency of cases, if we support adding much cases, automatically the cases volition physique up. So if you commencement putting a span oregon alternatively a dam to spot that specified unwanted oregon frivolous litigation doesn’t get into the watercourse of litigation, the tract of science volition beryllium contributing thing large to the federation and this is what I anticipation and spot your institutions volition bash successful this regard.”

During his closing remarks, Justice Aravind Kumar, talked astir the usage of Bharat being synonymous to India.

He said, “…Though I person utilized the connection India, if you spot the Constitution preamble, the connection is Bharat. That is wherefore Mr Bimalbhai utilized the connection Bharat. The Constitution says Bharat means India. You know, arsenic to what sanction is to beryllium kept, determination was a committee constituted, it went passim the magnitude and breadth of the country. Ultimately, they said Bharat should beryllium there. But Parliamentarians, successful their wisdom, said they would enactment it arsenic India. But they decided Bharat would beryllium synonymous with India, a national of states. Bha-ra-ta, that is wherever we should beryllium arrogant of being Indians. Bha is bhava, ra is raga and ta is tala. When each these 3 travel together, it volition beryllium a bully tune, a bully song. And that is what we should strive to spot that our state achieves excellence astatine each levels.”