Man fined £622 and slapped with criminal record for privacy fence mistake – know the rules and avoid the same fate

2 hours ago 1

A MAN has been fined £622 and slapped with a transgression grounds for a privateness obstruction mistake.

Southampton homeowner Farhan Khan built a timber obstruction connected apical of an existing ceramic wall.

The obstruction   was much  than 1m gangly  and was adjacent  to a road

2

The obstruction was much than 1m gangly and was adjacent to a roadCredit: Southampton City Council

Khan built the timber obstruction   connected  apical  of an existing ceramic  wall

2

Khan built the timber obstruction connected apical of an existing ceramic wallCredit: Google Maps

The obstruction was much than 1m gangly and was adjacent to a roadworthy - truthful it needed readying permission.

But Khan did not use for support and was told helium had breached the rules.

He applied for retrospective permission, but was turned down by the section council.

In May past twelvemonth the assembly ordered Khan to teardrop down the obstruction by the extremity of June.

He tried to entreaty the decision, but was excessively precocious by this constituent - and faced prosecution due to the fact that the obstruction was inactive up.

On November 13 Khan admitted failing to comply with a Planning Enforcement Notice astatine Southampton Magistrates' Court.

The offence specifically covers failing to conscionable the requirements of a announcement aft the clip bounds has expired.

Khan was fined a full of £622, giving him a criminal grounds for the obstruction mistake.

Councillor Sarah Bogle said: "In this case, our Planning Enforcement squad took the due action.

"They brought this prosecution to support the unsocial quality of the Bassett area.

"The prosecution supported section peoples’ priorities arsenic laid retired successful the Neighbourhood Plan."

Bogle said the readying strategy balances the rights of homeowners and their neighbours.

What is retrospective readying permission?

SOMETIMES a homeowner mightiness marque changes to their spot without asking for readying permission.

It is ineligible to use for readying support retrospectively.

People who build a structure can use for support afterwards.

The assembly tin inquire the nonmigratory to retrospectively use for readying support for immoderate completed enactment which needs it.

This usually happens erstwhile idiosyncratic complains to the assembly astir the caller work.

The aforesaid considerations volition use and permission only granted if it is deemed suitable by the section authority.

Retrospective readying applications are not automatically approved - astir 1 successful 5 are turned down.

If the exertion is turned down, the homeowner whitethorn person to teardrop down immoderate they person built.

But if it is approved, the retrospective readying support is conscionable arsenic valid and morganatic arsenic support granted earlier gathering enactment starts.

*** Disclaimer: This Article is auto-aggregated by a Rss Api Program and has not been created or edited by Nandigram Times

(Note: This is an unedited and auto-generated story from Syndicated News Rss Api. News.nandigramtimes.com Staff may not have modified or edited the content body.

Please visit the Source Website that deserves the credit and responsibility for creating this content.)

Watch Live | Source Article