Naomi Campbell claims she was 'deceived' over financial misconduct at charity

Supermodel Naomi Campbell is appealing a five-year prohibition from foundation work, claiming she was deceived by a chap trustee. She argues she was a unfortunate of fraud, including a fake email utilized to impersonate her successful cardinal decisions.

Model Naomi Campbell has claimed successful an entreaty against a Charity Commission prohibition that a chap trustee carried retired a "concerted deception" against her.

In September past year, she was banned from being a foundation trustee for 5 years aft The Charity Commission – a watchdog which regulates charities crossed England and Wales – recovered superior wealth mismanagement astatine the charity, Fashion for Relief, which Naomi founded.

The probe recovered foundation funds were utilized to wage for her enactment astatine a luxury edifice successful Cannes, on with spa treatments, country service, and cigarettes. Campbell was 1 of 3 trustees banned – Bianka Hellmich was banned for 9 years and Veronica Chou was handed a prohibition of 4 years. The exemplary has launched an entreaty against her ban, claiming she was a “victim of fraud and forgery” – including a fake email relationship said to person been utilized to impersonate her successful communications with lawyers. Neither Hellmich nor Chou person appealed against their bans.

Her lawsuit came earlier a tribunal connected Friday successful which lawyers for her and for the Commission variously applied for disclosure of documents. In written arguments for Campbell, barrister Andrew Westwood KC said: “Ms Campbell says that the (disqualification) bid was wrongly made due to the fact that she was not capable adequately, oregon astatine all, to woody with issues that arose with the moving of Fashion For Relief and/or contiguous her due and close presumption during the process which led to the making of the order.

“That was truthful arsenic a effect of deception connected the portion of, astatine least, her co-trustee Ms Bianka Hellmich.”

Mr Westwood added: “From the further documents that person present been provided by the committee determination is important further grounds of motive connected the portion of, astatine least, Ms Hellmich for the concerted deception of Ms Campbell, some successful narration to the commission’s enquiry that led to the making of the bid and successful the moving of the foundation much broadly.

“In particular, the documents look to amusement that during the play that the foundation was operational (2016-2021), Ms Hellmich was paid successful excess of £500,000 retired of foundation funds.” He told the tribunal connected Friday: “It is Ms Campbell’s lawsuit that due to the fact that of the deception that was practised connected her… she has been disqualified without having the accidental to respond to the reasons for disqualification and without having had show of the documents relied connected by the committee successful taking that action.”

He argued that was “fundamentally unfair”, and applied for disclosure of the entirety of the commission’s probe file, but this was rejected – with the justice ordering the committee to disclose a smaller magnitude of lone applicable documents. Faisel Sadiq, for the Charity Commission, said successful written statement that Campbell is “positively asserting that she was the unfortunate of fraud and forgery”.

“An important diagnostic of the appellant’s grounds of entreaty is that broadly she does not quality that determination was misconduct/mismanagement successful the medication of the charity, but alternatively she contends that she was unaware of the misconduct/mismanagement owed to wholesale deceit being perpetrated against her by a chap trustee, Ms Bianka Hellmich,” helium said. “Indeed, the appellant goes truthful acold arsenic alleging that her signature connected a papers had been forged.” Hellmich earlier this week denied the allegations to The Guardian.

Mr Sadiq told the tribunal connected Friday that Campbell’s presumption “is not to criticise the commission”, but to accidental that it was a fraud and that her lawsuit successful a nutshell is: “I knew thing astir it, I was a figurehead.” He successfully applied for Campbell to disclose communications betwixt herself and her chap trustees. The tribunal heard neither Ms Hellmich nor Ms Chou person launched appeals against their disqualifications.

In a connection connected Wednesday, Campbell said: “I americium grateful to the tribunal for allowing maine to entreaty the Charity Commission’s findings aft considering the grounds I person submitted. Ever since the commission’s report, I person fought to uncover the facts. What has been unearthed truthful acold is shocking.

“I privation to radiance a airy connected however casual it is to fake identities online and forestall anybody other going done what I person been through. I privation to guarantee that those liable are held accountable and justness is done.” She said this was “just the beginning” and reiterated that she has “never undertaken philanthropic enactment for idiosyncratic gain, nor volition I ever bash so”.

A Charity Commission spokesperson said: “The committee notes the tribunal’s archetypal ruling and the judge’s remark that the lawsuit volition necessitate Ms Campbell to beryllium precise superior allegations of wrongdoing against a chap trustee. These are important allegations for the courts to consider, and we volition proceed to co-operate afloat with the tribunal arsenic it does so.” Naomi was banned from being a foundation trustee successful September, aft a watchdog Charity Commission's probe uncovered grounds of fiscal misconduct.

Like this story? For much of the latest showbiz quality and gossip, travel Mirror Celebs on TikTok , Snapchat , Instagram , Twitter , Facebook , YouTube and Threads .