Naomi Campbell to appeal charity ban after claiming she was impersonated by fellow trustee

British supermodel Naomi Campbell is to entreaty against her prohibition connected being a charity trustee, claiming a fake email was utilized to impersonate her.

It was revealed past twelvemonth that the 54-year-old had been disqualified from being a foundation trustee for 5 years aft a watchdog recovered superior mismanagement of funds astatine Fashion for Relief, which she founded.

This included utilizing foundation funds to wage for her enactment astatine a five-star edifice successful Cannes, France, arsenic good arsenic spa treatments, country work and cigarettes.

Campbell was 1 of 3 of the charity’s trustees to beryllium disqualified arsenic a effect of the probe by the Charity Commission, which regulates charities successful England and Wales.

At the time, she said she was ‘extremely concerned’ by the regulator’s findings, adding that she was ‘not successful power of my charity’ having ‘put the power successful the hands of a lawyer’.

Her lawsuit is present owed to travel earlier a tribunal connected Friday, and Campbell said she wants to ‘ensure that those liable are held accountable and justness is done’.

Campbell claims successful a ruling seen by Metro that she was misled by her chap Fashion for Relief trustee Ms Bianka Tobinska (aka Hellmich).

She claims Hellmich had ‘purported to beryllium assisting her, but had successful information perpetrated a systematic fraud against her by assorted means including the usage of a fake email code utilized to correspond with erstwhile lawyers and others, withholding accusation and, successful effect, conducting a effect to the Charity Commission’s enquiry and consequent actions without the authorization oregon cognition of [Campbell].’

In effect Hellmich told The Guardian: ‘There’s perfectly nary information to the allegations.’

Representatives for the exemplary assertion that documents submitted to the committee gave a mendacious content of her engagement successful moving the UK charity, with grounds of a fake email relationship which they said was utilized to impersonate Campbell successful communications with lawyers.

They said she was truthful not made alert of the allegations being made successful the watchdog’s enquiry and did not person the accidental to reply them.

In a connection connected Wednesday, Campbell said: ‘I americium grateful to the tribunal for allowing maine to entreaty the Charity Commission’s findings aft considering the grounds I person submitted. Ever since the commission’s report, I person fought to uncover the facts. What has been unearthed truthful acold is shocking.

‘I privation to radiance a airy connected however casual it is to fake identities online and forestall anybody other going done what I person been through.

‘I privation to guarantee that those liable are held accountable and justness is done.

‘Having begun ineligible action, I volition person much to accidental successful owed course. This is conscionable the beginning.

‘As I person said before, I person ne'er undertaken philanthropic enactment for idiosyncratic gain, nor volition I ever bash so.’

In a further connection connected societal media connected February 6, Campbell wrote: ‘I’m blessed to stock that I’ve won support to look the Charity Commission’s ruling from past fall.

‘Ever since the Commission’s report, which was based connected incomplete and inaccurate information, I person been warring to uncover the facts.

‘The discoveries person been truthful disturbing and shocking that the Commission has agreed to revisit the case.

‘The idiosyncratic toll of this ordeal has been immense. My squad and I person watched years of humanitarian enactment being questioned portion moving tirelessly to uncover the truth. Yet done it all, we’ve emerged stronger and our supporters person stood by us. Your spot means everything.

‘Moving forward, I volition advocator for freater extortion against online individuality theft – a devastating  transgression that tin hap to anyone. They accidental what doesn’t interruption you makes you stronger, and I’m surely feeling overmuch stronger.’

A Charity Commission spokesperson told Metro successful effect to Campbell’s claims: ‘The Commission notes the Tribunal’s archetypal ruling and the judge’s remark that the lawsuit volition necessitate Ms Campbell to beryllium precise superior allegations of wrongdoing against a chap trustee.

‘These are important allegations for the courts to consider, and we volition proceed to cooperate afloat with the Tribunal arsenic it does so.’

There was nary disapproval of the Charity Commission successful the judge’s ruling granting Campbell an hold of clip successful which to entreaty her disqualification.

The disqualification bid remains successful spot portion Campbell’s entreaty is successful progress, meaning the September 2024 findings stay unaffected astatine this signifier successful the proceedings.

A probe into Fashion for Relief was opened by the committee successful 2021, with the foundation dissolved and removed from the registry of charities past year.

It had been acceptable up with the purpose of uniting the manner manufacture to relieve poorness and beforehand wellness and education, by making grants to different organisations and giving resources towards planetary disasters.

It hosted fundraising events to make income, including successful Cannes and London.

Some £344,000 has been recovered and a further £98,000 of charitable funds protected, the Charity Commission said successful September.

The regulator’s enquiry recovered that, betwixt April 2016 and July 2022, 8.5% of the charity’s wide expenditure was connected charitable grants.

The probe saw nary grounds that trustees took enactment to guarantee fundraising methods were successful the charity’s champion interests, oregon that the wealth it spent was tenable comparative to the income it generated.

It besides said it recovered immoderate fundraising expenditure to beryllium misconduct oregon mismanagement by the charity’s trustees.

This included a 14,800 euro (£12,300) formation from London to Nice for transferring creation and jewellery to a fundraising lawsuit successful Cannes successful 2018.

It besides looked into the determination to walk 9,400 euros (£7,800) of foundation funds connected a three-night enactment astatine a five-star edifice for Campbell.

In these cases, the trustees ‘failed to amusement however these were cost-effective and an due usage of the charity’s resources’, the committee said.

Furthermore, it examined expenses incurred by Campbell totalling astir 7,940 euros (£6,600), alongside the edifice stay, paid for by the charity.

These costs included spa treatments, country service, and the acquisition of cigarettes and edifice products.

The regulator said trustees explained that edifice costs were typically covered by a donor to the charity, truthful not costing the charity, but failed to supply immoderate grounds to enactment this.

Bianka Hellmich was disqualified arsenic a trustee for 9 years, and Veronica Chou for 4 years, alongside Campbell’s five-year ban.

The Charity Commission has been contacted for comment.

Got a story?

If you’ve got a personage story, video oregon pictures get successful interaction with the Metro.co.uk amusement squad by emailing america celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 oregon by visiting our Submit Stuff leafage – we’d emotion to perceive from you.