.png)
2 hours ago
1
A PENSIONER has slammed his neighbour's 6ft privateness obstruction which borders a plot they don't adjacent own.
Fred Tucker, 84, complained to his section council aft the family, which lives other him, built a obstruction astir a grassy country adjacent to his location successful Cwmparc, South Wales.
8
8
8
The household person ne'er owned the land, which is present wrong the boundary fence, but accidental they person leased the onshore from the assembly since January 2017.
They had nary ceremonial planning permission for a plot country oregon to erect the obstruction erstwhile they did truthful past year.
Up until past the household utilized the country to parkland vehicles portion Fred said helium would sometimes usage the onshore to crook his caravan around.
But past twelvemonth the household built the obstruction astir the humble conception of onshore successful bid to widen their garden.
Have you been progressive successful a neighbour enactment implicit a fence? Contact: [email protected]
Fred said helium approached them aft they began gathering the obstruction and asked if they'd received readying permission.
It transpired nary ceremonial readying support had been fixed - though the household support they had antecedently received verbal statement to usage the country for gardening purposes.
They assertion they'd been incorrectly informed by idiosyncratic moving for the assembly that they didn't request readying support for the fence.
Fred past said he'd kick to the assembly successful bid to person the obstruction taken down oregon reduced to a metre successful height.
The household was told they would person to use retrospectively and has present won the lawsuit to support the obstruction arsenic it is.
They person besides won support for alteration of usage to usage the country arsenic a 2nd garden.
I got imagination location for unthinkable price… but past neighbour RUINED it with obstruction (1)
Fred said the readying effect has near him baffled.
He had sent the assembly a papers signed by 54 neighbours who objected to the plans but Fred said his efforts "made nary difference".
Fred said: "The onshore is not their land. The onshore belongs to the council. You can't spot cars coming down the elevation and astir the corner.
"It besides wholly blocks my presumption from my thrust and my window.
8
8
8
"I utilized to ticker for the autobus astatine the apical of the thoroughfare and I'd question astatine the operator and he'd hold for me. I can't bash that anymore.
"I've had a bully presumption of the hills for 40 years. Now I look astatine that fence."
The household who erected the obstruction said: "We asked the assembly arsenic to whether we could enclose the onshore without the request for readying permission.
"We were told successful penning that consent wasn't needed and truthful we proceeded to erect bully prime fencing to enclose the onshore to go a play country for our young daughter.
"Mr Tucker past kicked up a fuss with the assembly that the onshore didn't person readying consent.
What are your rights implicit a obstruction row?
IT'S precise important to cognize your rights if you are embroiled successful a obstruction enactment with a neighbour.
How bash I cognize which broadside I own?
A boundary feature tin beryllium a fence, wall, hedge, ditch, portion of wire, oregon sometimes adjacent conscionable the borderline of a driveway.
The lone mode to cognize for definite who owns what broadside and to debar immoderate neighbour disputes, is to notation to the rubric program or Land Registry.
In this, the T people is utilized to bespeak who the bound belongs to and truthful who is liable for its upkeep, accidental pros at Jacksons Fencing.
Larger developments thin to person immoderate denotation provided by the builder, but determination are nary hard and accelerated rules
People often deliberation they are liable for the near (or right) manus bound wherever they live, but determination isn’t immoderate ineligible ground for this.
You tin cheque with HM Land Registry to spot which bound diagnostic you are liable for.
Often households can't get clasp of the paperwork but experts accidental they shouldn't panic.
Homeowners tin conjecture who owns the obstruction by checking wherever the rails are.
Pros say: "The obstruction is typically facing distant from their spot truthful that their neighbour gets the ‘good’ side.
“This is the astir unafraid mode of facing fencing truthful determination are nary rails for anyone to usage to ascent into your garden.
“This is past repeated with the neighbour connected the different broadside to guarantee that each location has some a ‘good’ and ‘bad’ obstruction side.”
Walls and fences are often built connected the onshore of the boundary's owner with the borderline of the partition marking the limit.
While professionals hold a glimpse astatine the obstruction tin springiness you a hint, it's not foolproof - truthful you can't beryllium certain.
Fines and punishment
It is recommended to ever cheque ineligible documents earlier making changes to avoid hefty fines.
There is no law that the neighbour has to get the bully broadside of the fence, truthful it's wholly up to whoever owns the fence.
Fencing pros person suggested: “It whitethorn beryllium worthy selecting a double-sided sheet with nary ‘bad’ broadside arsenic some sides look the aforesaid and rails are concealed wrong the obstruction panel.”
If 1 bound backs onto a roadworthy oregon footpath you can install the panels with the rails connected the inside
But if it's installed connected the outside, it tin supply an “easy ladder for burglars to participate your garden”.
The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) and the Property Litigation Association person created a mediation work to assistance neighbours resoluteness disputes implicit their spot boundaries without resorting to tribunal action.
RICS besides provides a database of surveyors who could assistance successful bound disputes.
If a quality continues, it is yet a tribunal that makes decisions, but they bash not similar specified disputes being enactment earlier them.
Changing a boundary
If you privation to alteration an existing boundary, specified arsenic replacing an aged obstruction with a caller one, we ever urge discussing with your neighbour archetypal and making definite it is each agreed.
The registered titles tin assistance you to scope an agreement, but lone if this accusation has been added.
In presumption of decorations connected a obstruction legal advisers recommended asking astir implicit who really archetypal installed it.
But they besides urged caution earlier getting to enactment connected amending the obstruction without getting much certainty yourself - since determination is simply a information of really being prosecuted for criminal damage.
How precocious tin a plot obstruction be?
The tallness of the obstruction is measured from your crushed level, this tin person an interaction when, owed to slopes successful the ground, your plot whitethorn beryllium astatine a higher level than your neighbours'.
A garden fence tin beryllium arsenic precocious arsenic 100m but you request to get readying support if it's implicit than 2m.
However, determination are immoderate complications to this.
If you are reasoning astir front garden fences, restrictions authorities that fences alongside a driveway tin beryllium a maximum of 1m oregon 3ft.
You would request to get readying support for putting a trellis connected a obstruction of 2m.
But, if immoderate works that you turn connected that trellis exceeds 2m, you bash not request to get a licence for the growing plant.
"We past had a gathering with readying enforcement and helium informed america precise apologetically we did really request readying consent which we attended to immediately.
"The process took a agelong clip and that was erstwhile Mr Tucker enactment up signs to effort to intimidate us."
A spokesperson for Rhondda Cynon Taf County Borough Council said: "The assembly tin corroborate it is the proprietor of the onshore successful question and has leased it for usage arsenic a backstage plot curtilage.
"In January 2024 the readying and improvement committee considered an exertion to alteration the usage of onshore to a plot curtilage, which included installing a 1.8m fence.
"Officers recommended the exertion for support arsenic the connection was emblematic of specified residential areas, was considered acceptable successful ocular terms, and was deemed to person nary adverse interaction upon pedestrian and road safety.
"A fig of objections were made against the exertion including by a section nonmigratory who spoke successful the readying meeting.
"Having considered each applicable worldly readying considerations, members of the readying and improvement committee resolved to o.k. the application."
8
8
.png "indianexpress.")
.png "khaleejtimes")
.png "arabnews")
.png "gulfnews"){kind=logo}
English (US) · 
Hindi (IN) ·