2 hours ago
2
The judgement of a five-judge Constitution seat headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud is simply a jolt to security companies which had been rejecting claims if accidents progressive transport vehicles of a peculiar value and if the drivers were not authorised to thrust them arsenic per ineligible stipulation.(File)
In a alleviation for commercialized conveyance drivers, the Supreme Court connected Wednesday held that a idiosyncratic holding a driving licence for a airy centrifugal conveyance (LMV) is besides entitled to thrust a transport conveyance with an unladen value not exceeding 7,500 kg.
The judgement of a five-judge Constitution seat headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud is simply a jolt to security companies which had been rejecting claims if accidents progressive transport vehicles of a peculiar value and if the drivers were not authorised to thrust them arsenic per ineligible stipulation.
“There is nary empirical information that LMV driving licence holders are liable for emergence successful roadworthy accidents successful the country,” Justice Hrishikesh Roy, who wrote the unanimous verdict for the bench, said.
He said the LMV driving licence holders, who spent maximum clip down the wheels, are seeking an reply from the tribunal and their grievances cannot beryllium rejected connected method grounds.
Besides the CJI and Justice Roy, the seat besides comprised Justices P S Narasimha, Pankaj Mithal and Manoj Misra.
The seat had reserved its verdict connected August 21 connected the vexatious ineligible contented aft Attorney General R Venkataramani, appearing for the Centre, had submitted that the consultations to amend the Motor Vehicles (MV) Act, 1988 are “almost complete”.
The apical tribunal asked the Centre to implicit the workout of amending the instrumentality astatine the earliest.
The ineligible question, which was answered by the bench, was whether a idiosyncratic holding a driving licence for a airy centrifugal conveyance (LMV) is besides entitled to thrust a transport conveyance with an unladen value not exceeding 7,500 kg.
The contented has fixed emergence to assorted disputes implicit outgo of claims by security companies successful mishap cases involving transport vehicles being driven by those possessing licences to thrust LMVs.
The security firms person been alleging that the centrifugal mishap assertion tribunals (MACTs) and the courts person been passing orders asking them to wage security claims, disregarding their objections with respect to the LMV driving licence.
The courts person been adopting a pro-insured attack portion deciding security assertion disputes, the security firms had said.
.png "indianexpress.")
.png "khaleejtimes")
.png "arabnews")
.png "gulfnews"){kind=logo}
English (US) · 
Hindi (IN) ·