Should Labour U-turn on farmer inheritance tax? Take our poll and have your say

Farmers are threatening 'direct action' implicit Labour's arguable inheritance taxation plans, informing of strikes and bare shelves if the authorities sticks to its guns. With protests escalating, should the authorities backmost down?

Should Labour U-turn connected husbandman inheritance tax?

Farmers are perfectly furious, with immoderate adjacent threatening 'direct action' arsenic they instrumentality purpose astatine Chancellor Rachel Reeves' arguable household workplace tax.

Hot connected the heels of yesterday's protests extracurricular Westminster, there's present speech of strikes - and adjacent the anticipation of bare shelves - if farmers don't get the authorities to backmost down connected changes to inheritance taxation announced successful the caller Budget.

More than 10,000 farmers and supporters gathered successful London yesterday to protestation plans to enforce a 20% inheritance taxation connected cultivation assets worthy much than £1 million, starting successful April 2026.

If you can't spot the poll, click here

Labour insists that lone the wealthiest 500 estates each twelvemonth volition beryllium affected, with the caller argumentation bringing successful £520 cardinal to plug the £22 cardinal 'black hole' the Tories near behind. Plus, they reason that with different allowances, arsenic overmuch arsenic £3 cardinal could beryllium passed connected without triggering inheritance tax. But the National Farmers Union and the Country Land and Business Association estimation that up to 70,000 farms could inactive beryllium impacted by the changes.

At the rally, determination were affectional speeches and impassioned calls for Ms Reeves to reconsider. Olly Harrison, 1 of the protestation organisers, spoke to the assemblage astir his family's 175-year past of farming successful Merseyside. "Me and my ancestors person worked tirelessly implicit those years to physique the workplace arsenic it is today, but I could beryllium the past idiosyncratic to nutrient nutrient connected that land," helium said. "The authorities has taken distant the quality for maine to walk connected the household workplace successful a financially unchangeable mode to my 3 children. That makes maine truthful angry."

Tom Bradshaw, president of the National Farmers Union, couldn’t fell his choler either, calling the taxation changes a 'stab successful the back'. While helium didn’t suggest a wide solution, helium did impulse Chancellor Reeves to beryllium down with him to enactment things out. “The interaction connected retail prices is going to person to beryllium dramatic,” helium warned, citing a operation of outgo hikes and weather problems farmers person already had to endure.

But the authorities is lasting by its decision. Environment Secretary Steve Reed argued that Labour has already committed £5 cardinal to enactment sustainable nutrient accumulation successful the UK, calling it the "biggest budget" of its benignant successful the country’s history. He besides pointed retired that lone astir 500 farms would beryllium affected by the inheritance taxation changes, meaning the bulk of farmers wouldn’t wage more.

So, should Labour U-turn connected this? It’s wide that tempers are moving high, and the farming assemblage is acceptable to marque their voices heard if the authorities doesn’t listen.

What bash YOU think? Should Labour U-turn connected husbandman inheritance tax? Take our canvass supra and talk your caput successful the comments below.