2 hours ago
1
4-1, SC upholds citizenship proviso for migrants to Assam from East Pak
Syllabus:
Preliminary Examination: Indian Polity and Governance-Constitution, Political System, Panchayati Raj, Public Policy, Rights Issues, etc.
Mains Examination: General Studies II: Indian Constitution—historical underpinnings, evolution, features, amendments, important provisions and basic structure.
What’s the ongoing story-In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court connected Thursday upheld the law validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which granted citizenship to immigrants who entered Assam earlier January 1, 1966, and called for stricter implementation of laws against amerciable migration and judicial monitoring of the implementation of migration and citizenship legislations.
Key elements of the Supreme Court’s decision-
• The seat ruled, “Immigrants who entered the State of Assam connected oregon aft 25.03.1971 are not entitled to the extortion conferred vide Section 6A and consequently, they are declared to beryllium amerciable immigrants”.
• CJI Chandrachud said Section 6A is not violative of Articles 6 and 7 of the Constitution, which prescribe a cut-off day for conferring citizenship for migrants from East and West Pakistan astatine the “commencement of the Constitution”, that is January 26, 1950. “Legislative nonsubjective of Section 6A was to equilibrium the humanitarian needs of migrants of Indian root and the interaction of the migration connected the economical and taste needs of Indian States,” said CJI Chandrachud.
• “Though different states stock a greater borderline with Bangladesh, the interaction of migration successful Assam successful presumption of numbers and resources is greater. Thus, the yardstick of migration to Assam is reasonable. The cut-off day of March 25, 1971, is tenable due to the fact that the Pakistani Army launched Operation Searchlight to curb the Bangladeshi nationalist question successful East Pakistan connected March 26, 1971. Migrants earlier the cognition were considered migrants of the Indian partition; and “both the supra yardsticks person a rational nexus with the entity of Section 6A”.
• “Undocumented migrants could beryllium registered arsenic citizens nether Section 5(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act earlier it was amended by the Citizenship (Amendment) Act 2003 to exclude ‘illegal immigrants’. Thus, the assertion of the petitioner that Section 6A is unconstitutional due to the fact that alternatively of preventing migration to Assam, it incentivizes migrants successful different states to travel to Assam to unafraid citizenship done Section 6A is erroneous,” said the Supreme Court bench.
• “Section 6A falls wrong the bounds of the Constitution and does not contravene the foundational principles of fraternity, nor does it infringe upon Articles 6 and 7, Article 9, Article 14, Article 21, Article 29, Article 326, oregon Article 355 of the Constitution of India.”
“Section 6A does not clash with the IEAA — Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950 — oregon established principles of planetary law,” said the ruling.
• On Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, which introduced a cut-off day specifically nether the Assam Accord, the Court, portion upholding it, said that citizenship cannot beryllium interpreted successful “a antagonistic mode that selectively applies it to a peculiar conception portion labelling different faction arsenic ‘illegal immigrants’.”
• In his opinion, concurring with the bulk view, Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud said that portion the Constitution recognises a “right to conserve culture,” the proviso indispensable beryllium work successful airy of the “multi-cultural and plural federation that India is.”
• “The assertion of the petitioners is that Section 6A is violative of Article 29 due to the fact that it permits radical from Bangladesh who person a chiseled civilization to beryllium ordinarily nonmigratory successful Assam and unafraid citizenship which infringes upon their close to conserve Assamese culture,” the Court noted portion rejecting the argument.
Key Points to Ponder-
• What petition said successful this case?
• What is Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955?
• What are the questions surrounding Section 6A?
• What is the Assam Accord?
• “The migrant concern successful Assam was unsocial successful examination to the remainder of India”-Elaborate
• Who are ‘Citizens’?
• Citizens and Aliens-compare and opposition successful presumption of civilian and governmental rights
• What are those rights and privileges that the Constitution of India confers connected the citizens of India and denies the aforesaid to aliens?
• The Citizenship Act of 1955 prescribes 5 ways of acquiring citizenship-Know them successful detail
• The Citizenship Act, 1955, prescribes 3 ways of losing citizenship-What are they?
• Why Justice Pardiwala dissented?
• ‘The verdict has value not conscionable for Assam, wherever authorities has agelong been shaped by issues of migration and demography, but besides for wider issues of citizenship and Parliament’s powers successful this regard’-Comment
• Does Parliament person the powerfulness to marque instrumentality regulating citizenship?
• “Parliament has the powerfulness to assistance citizenship nether antithetic conditions truthful agelong arsenic the differentiation is reasonable”-analyse with caller verdict by Supreme Court
• What Articles 6 and 7 of the Constitution says?
• Does Section 6A interruption the Right to Equality?
• Does Section 6A facilitate “external aggression” by allowing amerciable immigration?
•Does granting citizenship to migrants interruption the rights of Assamese radical to conserve their culture?
• Why these observations made by Supreme Courts are crucial?
• Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 and 2019 Citizenship Amendment Act-Compare and contrast
For Your Information-
• Assam accord 1985 SC Verdict: In a landmark verdict, the Supreme Court connected Thursday (October 17), upheld the law validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which granted citizenship to immigrants who entered Assam earlier March 24, 1971.
• A five-judge Bench headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud delivered the judgement. While speechmaking retired the verdict, the CJI said that portion 4 judges, including himself, formed portion of the bulk verdict, Justice JB Pardiwala penned a dissent.
Section 6A was added to the statute successful 1985 pursuing the signing of the Assam Accord betwixt the Rajiv Gandhi authorities astatine the Centre and the All Assam Students’ Union (AASU), aft a six-year-long agitation against the introduction of migrants from Bangladesh into Assam.
• The tripartite Assam Accord signed among the cardinal and Assam governments and the leaders of the Assam Movement acceptable January 1, 1966 arsenic the basal cut-off day for the detection of “foreigners” and their deletion from electoral rolls. It besides provided a process for the assistance of citizenship to those who arrived successful the authorities aft that date, upto March 24, 1971. These aspects were codified successful Section 6A of The Citizenship Act. In 2014, a two-judge Bench referred the situation to Section 6A to a Constitution Bench, highlighting immoderate cardinal questions of law.
• A cardinal constituent of the Assam Accord was determining who is simply a foreigner successful the state. Clause 5 of the Assam Accord states that January 1, 1966 shall service arsenic the basal cut-off day for the detection and deletion of “foreigners” but it besides contains provisions for the regularisation of those who arrived successful the authorities aft that day and up till March 24, 1971.
• Section 6A was inserted into the Citizenship Act to facilitate this. All persons of “Indian origin” who entered the authorities earlier January 1, 1966 and person been “ordinarily resident” successful Assam ever since “shall beryllium deemed to beryllium citizens of India”. Additionally, it provides that anyone who entered and resided successful Assam aft January 1, 1966 but earlier March 24, 1971 who has been “detected to beryllium a foreigner” would person the accidental to registry themselves according to rules made by the Central Government.
• The verdict whitethorn besides person an effect connected the National Register for Citizens (NRC) successful Assam. In 2019 a two-judge seat led by past CJI Ranjan Gogoi passed an bid stating “We marque it wide that taxable to orders arsenic whitethorn beryllium passed by the Constitution Bench successful Writ Petition (C) No.562 of 2012 and Writ Petition (C) No.311 of 2015, National Register of Citizens (NRC) volition beryllium updated.”
Do You Know-
• The petitioners see the NGO Assam Public Works, the Assam Sanmilita Mahasangha and others who assertion that mounting a antithetic cut-off day for citizenship successful Assam is “discriminatory, arbitrary and illegal”. They besides assertion that changing demographics successful the authorities volition impact the rights of indigenous Assamese radical to conserve their civilization nether Article 29 of the Constitution of India.
• Their petition, which was filed successful 2012, states that “the exertion of Section 6A to the State of Assam unsocial has led to a perceptible alteration successful the demographic signifier of the State and has reduced the radical of Assam to a number successful their ain State. The aforesaid is detrimental to the economical and governmental well-being of the State and acts arsenic a potent unit against the taste survival, governmental power and employment opportunities of the people.”
• The Centre, connected the different hand, relied connected Article 11 of the Constitution which gives Parliament the powerfulness to “to marque immoderate proviso with respect to the acquisition and termination of citizenship and each different matters relating to citizenship”.
• The ineligible strategy for granting citizenship for those who migrated from Pakistan is successful Articles 6 and 7 of the Constitution. The petitioners argued that Section 6A, which deals with migrants from East Pakistan (later Bangladesh) amends this proviso — a alteration that tin lone beryllium made done a law amendment.
• Justice Pardiwala connected the different hand, successful his dissenting opinion, held that the proviso was unconstitutional and suffered from “temporal unreasonableness” arsenic it does not prescribe a clip bounds for detecting foreigners and determining whether they were citizens. This, helium held, relieves the authorities of the load of identifying immigrants and deleting them from the electoral rolls which goes against the nonsubjective of providing citizenship portion protecting the taste and governmental rights of the radical of Assam.
Other Important Articles Covering the aforesaid topic:
📍Four issues successful Assam verdict
📍SC upholds Parliament primacy, but besides flags fraternity arsenic cardinal factor
Hamas person Sinwar, designer of October 7 attack, killed successful Gaza
Syllabus:
Preliminary Examination: Current events of nationalist and planetary importance.
Mains Examination: General Studies II: Effect of policies and authorities of developed and processing countries connected India’s interests
What’s the ongoing story– The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) connected Thursday (October 17) evening announced that it had eliminated Hamas main Yahya Sinwar successful a targeted crushed cognition successful Rafah successful confederate Gaza. Sinwar was among the 3 Hamas militants killed successful the operation, with his individuality being confirmed with the assistance of a DNA trial utilizing Sinwar’s illustration from his clip successful imprisonment successful Israel.
Key Points to Ponder-
• Who was Yahya Sinwar?
• What was Yahya Sinwar’s relation successful the October 7 attack?
• What is the value of Israel sidesplitting Yahya Sinwar?
For Your Information-
• Yahya Sinwar was calved successful the Khan Younis exile campy successful southbound Gaza successful 1962, backmost erstwhile the portion was nether Egyptian control. His parents were expelled from Ashkelon by Zionist forces successful 1948 during the Palestinian Nakba (“catastrophe”), which saw mass-scale taste cleansing of Arabs amidst the enactment of Israel.
• Sinwar was progressive successful the Muslim Brotherhood successful the aboriginal 1980s, and was arrested for protesting Israeli concern portion a assemblage pupil astatine the Islamic University successful Gaza. He is credited with founding Hamas’s Internal Security Force Al Majd, liable for managing interior information matters, investigating — and allegedly brutally eliminating — suspected Israeli agents and Palestinian collaborators, and tracking down Israeli quality and information services officers.
• In 1988, Sinwar was arrested by Israel for the execution of 12 “collaborating” Palestinians (an enactment that had earned him the moniker ‘Butcher of Khan Younis’), and plotting the abduction and decease of 2 Israeli soldiers.
He spent 22 years successful assorted Israeli prisons earlier being released successful 2011 arsenic portion of a monolithic captive speech deal. He rejoined Hamas and roseate done the ranks to win Ismail Haniyeh arsenic Hamas’s person successful Gaza successful 2017. He was elevated to the presumption of Hamas Politburo main this August aft Haniyeh was killed successful a targeted rocket onslaught successful Iran the period before.
Do You Know-
• Israel has agelong viewed Sinwar arsenic the mastermind of the October 7 attack, and referred to him arsenic “a dormant antheral walking”. It is present believed that the onslaught was planned arsenic aboriginal arsenic December 2022, erstwhile Sinwar promised to nonstop Israel “endless rockets” and deploy “a limitless flood of soldiers”, successful a rally successful Gaza.
• The October 7 onslaught saw Hamas fighters interruption Israeli defences, sidesplitting 1,200 radical and taking much than 150 Israelis hostage. This was the biggest flare-up successful Gaza successful years, and raised large questions astir the readiness of Israel’s defence apparatus.
• The US, a cardinal state to Israel, past period charged Sinwar and different Hamas leaders with “financing, directing, and overseeing a decades-long run to execution American citizens and endanger the nationalist information of the United States”.
Other Important Articles Covering the aforesaid topic:
📍Who is adjacent successful enactment aft the decease of Hamas main Yahya Sinwar?
JNU plans Shivaji centre: Lessons from his epoch connected Akhand Bharat concept
Syllabus:
Preliminary Examination: History of India and Indian National Movement
Mains Examination: General Studies I: Significant personalities
What’s the ongoing story– The Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) is readying to commencement a ‘Centre of Excellence’ named aft Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, which volition gully lessons from his epoch to recognize the “concept of Akhand Bharat” and his “struggle for Hindavi Swaraj”, The Indian Express has learnt.
Key Points to Ponder-
• Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj-Know successful detail
• Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and Maratha Empire-Know successful detail
• Administration nether Shivaji-Know successful detail
• What were the taxes introduced by Shivaji?
• Why Tax strategy nether Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was unique?
• What is the conception of Akhand Bharat?
• Why the conception of Akhand Bharat, often misunderstood?
• “Shivaji’s subject innovations, specified arsenic “ganimi kawa (guerilla warfare) fortifications and naval expansions were acold up of his contemporaries”-Analyse
For Your Information-
• According to the NCERT Text Book, Maratha kingdom was established by Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj (1630). The Maratha kingdom was different almighty determination kingdom to originate retired of a sustained absorption to Mughal rule. Shivaji (1630–1680) carved retired a unchangeable kingdom with the enactment of almighty warrior families (deshmukhs). Groups of highly mobile, peasant-pastoralists (kunbis) provided the backbone of the Maratha army. Shivaji utilized these forces to situation the Mughals successful the peninsula. After Shivaji’s death, effectual powerfulness successful the Maratha authorities was wielded by a household of Chitpavan Brahmanas who served Shivaji’s successors arsenic Peshwa (or main minister). Poona became the superior of the Maratha kingdom.
• Historian PN Deshpande, successful his book, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj (2002), describes the Maratha warrior king’s subject tactics arsenic strategical and calculated, characterised by abrupt raids and persistent assaults that kept his enemies perpetually disconnected balance. Despite commanding a smaller army, Shivaji Maharaj consistently outmanoeuvred his adversaries done guerrilla warfare, earning the awe and fearfulness of his opponents. This estimation is reflected successful overseas accounts of the Surat raids.
• Akhand Bharat-The Sangh Parivar has agelong imagined an Indian federation that existed from the clip of the Ramayana, covering the landmass stretching from today’s Afghanistan to Myanmar and Tibet to Sri Lanka. A representation titled “Punyabhoomi Bharat” published by the RSS-run Suruchi Prakashan, labels Afghanistan arsenic “Upganathan”, Kabul arsenic “Kubha Nagar”, Peshawar arsenic “Purushpur”, Multan arsenic “Moolsthan”, Tibet arsenic “Trivishtap,” Sri Lanka arsenic “Singhaldweep”, and Myanmar arsenic “Brahmadesh”.
Back successful 1944, arsenic the Muslim League pressed for a abstracted Pakistan, the historiographer Radha Kumud Mookerji archetypal articulated the thought of Akhand Bharat successful his statesmanlike code delivered astatine an “Akhand Bharat Conference”.
“…The homeland of the Hindus done milenniums of their past has been thing abbreviated of the full of India stretching successful its continental expanse from Kashmir to the Cape, from Nanga Parvat and Amarnath to Madura and Rameshwaram and from Dwarka to Puri,” Mookerji said.
Akhand Bharat was a information of geography, helium argued: “India has been fashioned by Nature arsenic an indisputable geographical portion marked retired from the remainder of the satellite by well-defined boundaries and fixed frontiers astir which determination tin beryllium nary uncertainty oregon uncertainty.”
Other Important Articles Covering the aforesaid topic
📍History of the Akhand Bharat idea, and successful the imaginativeness of the RSS
📍How Shivaji became the dependable of aggregate societal causes
📍A strategical onslaught connected the Mughal Empire: Why Shivaji Maharaj attacked Surat
EXPRESS NETWORK
Marital rape: Will striking down immunity to husbands make caller offence, asks SC
Syllabus:
Preliminary Examination: Current events of nationalist and planetary importance.
Mains Examination:
• General Studies I: General Studies I: Salient features of Indian Society, Social empowerment, Role of women and women’s organization
• General Studies II: Structure, enactment and functioning of the Executive and the Judiciary
What’s the ongoing story-The Supreme Court Thursday sought to cognize whether it would beryllium creating a caller offence by striking down the proviso successful penal instrumentality which prevents wives from prosecuting their husbands for rape.
Key Points to Ponder-
• What is Section 375 of the IPC?
• What is the marital rape exemption?
• What is the Status of Constitutionality of the marital rape objection successful India?
• What is the Concept down marriages successful Indian Subcontinent oregon successful the Indian Society?
• The Institution of Marriage-Why matrimony is referred arsenic an institution?
• Influence of Legislations similar the prevention of Sati Act, 1829, The Hindu widow Remarriage Act, 1856, The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 connected Hindu Marriage-Know successful detail
• What is Marital rape immunity?
• Criminalisation And Non-Criminalisation Of Marital Rape-For and Against
• Status of Marital Rape successful India-Latest Data by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) and National household wellness Survey
• “Doctrine of Coverture”, Article 14 and Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and Exception 2 to Section 375 of Indian Penal Code
• Justice Verma Committee Report and Pam Rajput committee’s study ‘Status of Women successful India’ connected Marital Rape-Know the Key Highlights
• What is Law Commission of India’s Stand connected Marital Rape?
• United Nations Committee connected Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) connected Violence against Women successful India
• Government of India’s Stand connected Marital Rape?
• Criminalization of Marital Rape-Does the instrumentality exists successful different Countries?
• What person the courts said successful earlier instances similar High courts Karnataka and Gujrat connected Marital rape?
For Your Information-
• Section 375 defines rape and lists 7 notions of consent which, if vitiated, would represent the offence of rape by a man. However, the proviso contains a important exemption: “Sexual intercourse oregon intersexual acts by a antheral with his ain wife, the woman not being nether eighteen years of age, is not rape.”
This exemption fundamentally allows a marital close to a hubby who tin with ineligible authorisation workout his close to consensual oregon non-consensual enactment with his wife.
• The exemption is besides nether situation earlier the Gujarat High Court connected the grounds that it undermines consent of a pistillate based connected her marital status. Separately, the Karnataka HC has allowed the framing of marital rape charges against a antheral contempt the exemption successful law.
• The marital rape immunity is known to respective post-colonial communal instrumentality countries. Australia (1981), Canada (1983), and South Africa (1993) person enacted laws that criminalise marital rape.
In the United Kingdom, the House of Lords overturned the objection successful 1991. In their landmark determination successful the lawsuit known arsenic R v R, the Lords took the presumption that the clip had “arrived erstwhile the instrumentality should state that a rapist remains a rapist taxable to the transgression law, irrespective of his narration with his victim”. They besides said that the verdict was not creating a caller offence, alternatively lone removing a communal instrumentality fabrication that has its roots successful ecclesiastical law.
• It was argued that the House of Lords determination amounted to a retrospective alteration successful transgression law, which would magnitude to a breach of the European Convention connected Human Rights. The European Court of Justice reviewed the ruling and upheld the determination of the Lords arsenic a “foreseeable evolution” of the law.
Subsequently, successful 2003 marital rape was outlawed by authorities successful the UK.
Other Important Articles Covering the aforesaid topic:
📍 Legally, enactment idiosyncratic tin accidental no, not wife: judge
📍Centre argues against labeling marital rape arsenic ‘rape,’ says it is ‘disproportionate’ and ‘harsh
CJI names Justice Khanna arsenic his successor
Syllabus:
Preliminary Examination: Indian Polity and Governance-Constitution, Political System, Panchayati Raj, Public Policy, Rights Issues, etc.
Main Examination: General Studies II: Structure, enactment and functioning of the Executive and the Judiciary
What’s the ongoing story– Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud has written to the Union Law Ministry, naming Justice Sanjiv Khanna, the second-most elder justice of the Supreme Court, arsenic his successor. When approved by the government, Justice Khanna volition beryllium the 51st Chief Justice of India and volition person a tenure of 6 months successful bureau earlier retiring connected May 13, 2025. With CJI Chandrachud acceptable to discontinue connected November 10, the government, arsenic per convention, had written to him past week requesting him to sanction his successor successful office.
Key Points to Ponder-
• Who tin go the Chief Justice of India?
• Who appoints the CJI?
• What is the strategy followed for recommending and appointing judges?
• What is the disapproval of the collegium system?
• What is the process for removal of CJI?
• First Judges Case (1982), Second Judges Case (1993) and Third Judges Case (1998)-Know successful detail
• What was the Supreme court’s ruling successful the Second Judges lawsuit (1993), with respect to the assignment of a judge?
• Third Judges lawsuit (1998) and Supreme Court’s ruling successful lawsuit of the appointment-What was the Supreme Court’s ruling?
• The National Judicial Appointments Commission Act of 2014 and the Collegium System-Compare and Contrast
For Your Information-
• The Chief Justice of India and the different judges of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President nether clause (2) of Article 124 of the Indian Constitution. It is mentioned successful Article 124 that assignment by the President is to beryllium done “after consultation” with judges of the Supreme Court, arsenic the President whitethorn “deem necessary”.
• Article 217, which deals with the assignment of High Court judges, says the President should consult the CJI, Governor, and Chief Justice of the High Court concerned. Further, the tenure of a CJI is until they attain the property of 65 years, portion High Court judges discontinue astatine 62 years.
The much than 2 decades-old collegium strategy is followed successful the assignment of judges, consisting of 5 seniormost judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts. The authorities gets a inheritance enquiry done by the Intelligence Bureau (IB) astatine times from the names archetypal suggested for assignment by the collegium. While the authorities tin besides rise objections, usually the collegium’s volition prevails. The word “collegium” is not mentioned successful the constitution, which lone speaks of consultation by the President.
• Given the ambiguity of the connection “consult”, this method of assignment has often been challenged successful the courts, starring to cases specified arsenic the First Judges Case wherever it was held that proposal made by the CJI to the President tin beryllium refused for “cogent reasons”. This meant the President oregon the enforcement would beryllium successful a much influential presumption successful deciding appointments. With consequent cases and judgements, this changed.
• The Supreme Court laid down guidelines for appointments and transfers — starring to the contiguous signifier of the collegium successful which decisions are to beryllium taken by a bulk of the 5 seniormost judges, a effect of the ‘Third Judges Case’. And so, successful the past fewer years, the communal knowing was that the independency of the judiciary from the enforcement was to beryllium guarded successful matters of appointments.
Usually, the seniormost justice of the tribunal aft the main justness (in presumption of the years served) is recommended arsenic the successor. This normal was memorably discarded by erstwhile Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, who appointed Justice AN Ray arsenic CJI successful 1973 implicit his seniors for a CJI much favourable to her regime.
• According to the government’s Memorandum of process for the assignment of Supreme Court Judges, seniority is to beryllium the norm. It says the Union Minister of Law, Justice and Company Affairs seeks the proposal of the outgoing Chief Justice of India for the assignment of the adjacent CJI.
After the collegium’s recommendations are finalised and received from the CJI, the Law Minister volition enactment up the proposal to the Prime Minister who volition counsel the President connected the substance of appointment.
Other Important Articles Covering the aforesaid topic:
📍Explained: How the Chief Justice of India is appointed
ECONOMY
Direct taxation stock up astatine 57 per cent of full taxation revenue, highest successful 14 years
Syllabus:
Preliminary Examination: Economic and Social Development-Sustainable Development, Poverty, Inclusion, Demographics, Social Sector Initiatives, etc.
Main Examination: General Studies III: Indian Economy and issues relating to planning, mobilization, of resources, growth, improvement and employment.
What’s the ongoing story-The publication of nonstop taxes to full taxation gross climbed to 56.72 per cent successful 2023-24, the highest successful 14 years. The surge was adjacent much stark successful the nonstop tax-to-GDP ratio — the stock of nonstop taxes successful the wide economical output successful the state — which jumped to implicit a two-decade precocious of 6.64 per cent, time-series information released by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) nether the Ministry of Finance showed Thursday.
Key Points to Ponder-
• What is Direct Tax?
• What is the nett nonstop tax?
• What are the types of taxes successful India?
• What is the quality betwixt nonstop and indirect taxes?
• Examples of nonstop and indirect taxes?
• How does a nonstop taxation work?
• What is nett nonstop taxation postulation successful India?
• Why Direct taxation is important?
• What are the Government initiatives to amended nonstop taxes and indirect taxes?
• How is the taxation operation successful India?
• What is tax-GDP ratio?
• Direct tax-to-GDP ratio reflects what?
• “The publication of nonstop taxes to full taxation gross climbed to 56.72 per cent successful 2023-24, the highest successful 14 years”-Why this is significant?
For Your Information-
• With the nonstop taxation to full taxation gross expanding successful FY24 from 54.63 per cent the erstwhile year, the stock of indirect taxes to full taxation gross is present down to 43.28 per cent. The past clip the stock of nonstop taxes had zoomed higher than the 56.72 level recorded successful FY24 was mode backmost successful FY10 astatine 60.78 per cent. A higher stock of nonstop taxes is considered progressive arsenic it is linked to income levels compared to indirect taxes that are levied crossed the committee and so, are considered to interaction the mediocre much than the well-to-do.
• The time-series information reveals different inclination — of idiosyncratic income taxation collections surging higher than firm taxation collections for the 2nd twelvemonth running. Barring FY22, idiosyncratic income taxation collections person been higher than firm taxation collections for the past 4 years. FY24 was the 2nd twelvemonth successful a enactment erstwhile idiosyncratic income taxation postulation astatine Rs 10.45 lakh crore was higher than firm taxation postulation of Rs 9.11 lakh crore.
• This inclination marks a reversal from the earlier inclination of firm taxation collections being higher than income taxation collections earlier the firm taxation complaint chopped determination by the authorities successful September 2019, erstwhile the corp taxation complaint for each existing companies (manufacturing and non-manufacturing) was chopped to 22 per cent (without surcharge and cess) from 30 per cent and a taxation complaint of 15 per cent was announced for recently incorporated home companies.
• Tax buoyancy — the maturation complaint of taxes successful narration to the economy’s nominal maturation complaint — grew to 2.12 successful 2023-24 from 1.18 successful the erstwhile fiscal year.
• The outgo of taxation postulation — indicating the expenditure connected taxation postulation arsenic a proportionality of the full taxation collections — inched down to 0.44 per cent successful FY24, the lowest level since 2000-01.
• The state-wise breakup of the nonstop taxation information shows that astir 39 per cent of the full nonstop taxation gross comes from Maharashtra (Rs 7.6 lakh crore successful FY24), followed by Karnataka with astir 12 per cent stock (Rs 2.34 lakh crore) and Delhi with 10.4 per cent stock (Rs 2.03 lakh crore).
Other Important Articles Covering the aforesaid topic:
📍India’s tax-GDP ratio whitethorn beryllium excessively high
EXPLAINED
WHY RESEARCHERS STUDIED MARINE TEMPERATURES IN THE TWILIGHT ZONE?
Syllabus:
Preliminary Examination: General issues connected Environmental ecology, Bio-diversity and Climate Change – that bash not necessitate taxable specialization.
Mains Examination: General Studies III: Conservation, biology contamination and degradation, biology interaction assessment.
What’s the ongoing story– Just arsenic vigor waves notation to a higher-than-average somesthesia prevailing connected land, Marine Heat Waves (MHWs) are defined by the antithetic warming of water waters. In caller years, planetary warming has made MHWs much predominant and intense, but a caller survey present says this improvement is witnessed good beyond the surface.
Key Points to Ponder-
• What is marine vigor wave?
• What you recognize by “twilight zone” of oceans?
• What person researchers recovered astir vigor waves successful oceans?
• What is meant by eddy current?
• What is the relevance of the finding?
For Your Information-
• Marine Heat Waves (MHWs) person typically been measured by observing temperatures astatine the water surface. As 1 goes deeper, the magnitude of sunlight penetrating the h2o decreases. Coupled with precocious oversea pressure, humans person recovered deep-ocean exploration highly challenging.
The “twilight zone” of oceans, located betwixt 200 and 1,000 metres, inactive has immoderate visibility, but probe connected the domain is lacking. The survey (‘Common occurrences of subsurface heatwaves and acold spells successful water eddies’) published successful Nature connected Wednesday (October 16) saw researchers from China and Australia analyse MHWs and Marine Cold Spells successful this region.
• Researchers recovered that MHWs heavy successful oceans whitethorn beryllium “significantly under-reported”. Ming Feng, the Senior Principal Research Scientist astatine the Australian authorities bureau CSIRO, was 1 of the survey authors. In an nonfiction successful The Conversation, helium wrote astir however successful the heavy ocean, atmospheric factors are not liable for somesthesia changes (unlike MHWs).
Instead, eddy currents play a large role. Feng described them arsenic “huge loops of swirling current, sometimes hundreds of kilometres crossed and reaching down implicit 1,000 metres”. Eddies transportation lukewarm oregon acold h2o crossed agelong distances.
• To grounds the somesthesia changes astatine that depth, semipermanent moorings – measurement buoys suspended astatine extent – were deployed crossed the world’s oceans for the study. Argo floats, which are robotic divers that tin spell 2,000 metres heavy and resurface, were utilized to illustration somesthesia and salinity.
• Extreme somesthesia changes successful the somesthesia of the twilight portion are besides a substance of concern, since galore food taxon and plankton reside here. Planktons signifier the basal of the oceanic nutrient concatenation and are a nutrient root for tiny fish.
Other Important Articles Covering the aforesaid topic:
📍Warming up to clime change: Why bash planetary oversea aboveground temperatures matter?
For immoderate queries and feedback, interaction priya.shukla@indianexpress.com
Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – Indian Express UPSC Hub, and travel america on Instagram and X.
.png "indianexpress.")
.png "khaleejtimes")
.png "arabnews")
.png "gulfnews"){kind=logo}
English (US) · 
Hindi (IN) ·