Atul goes to IIT

For equality of accidental to beryllium meaningful, a idiosyncratic from a marginalised caste and a mediocre household indispensable beryllium capable to determination beyond his oregon her circumstances, and rise. Atul Kumar did conscionable that, successful nary tiny portion owed to the arduous sacrifices of his family. The Dalit aspirant cleared the entranceway exam for IIT-Dhanbad. But it took the Supreme Court of India’s involution to guarantee helium could get a spot successful the prestigious college. His father, a regular wage labourer from Titora colony successful occidental Uttar Pradesh, who had studied till people 9, had to determination the apex tribunal aft Atul was denied admittance due to the fact that helium was a fewer minutes precocious successful depositing the Rs 17,500 fee connected the university’s online portal.

While instructing IIT-Dhanbad to supply Atul a seat, the Chief Justice of India said, “… arsenic judges of the SC, we should guarantee that nary kid loses admittance due to the fact that they don’t person Rs 17,500.” The seat is right, of course. But the Court’s remark raises a much cardinal question astir the hurdles of bureaucracy successful an unequal society. Rules and regulations are indispensable successful an acquisition strategy wherever request acold outstrips supply. However, they inevitably become, for many, different hurdle successful a strategy that is already hard to navigate. There are galore similar Atul, who flooded immense likelihood to marque it to India’s premier acquisition institutions. And to beryllium fair, galore universities, including the IITs, person enactment successful spot systems to assistance them successful their clip astatine the university. Atul Kumar’s lawsuit highlights the request to marque compassion a portion not conscionable of the teaching process and field beingness — it indispensable statesman astatine the beginning, with the admissions system.