Simply put, successful autarkic India, assemblage condescension went connected to don the cloak of law morality whose intent has been to betterment the autochthonal individuality retired of its beingness with the assistance of allegedly immutable preambular values specified arsenic secularism.
Nov 29, 2024 04:41 IST First published on: Nov 29, 2024 astatine 04:41 IST
The wide elections of 2024 witnessed the unfortunate pitting of Jai Shri Ram against Jai Samvidhan, which possibly captures the broader ongoing tussle betwixt civilisation and Constitution successful the Bharatiya context. While immoderate whitethorn beryllium tempted to disregard this arsenic a tussle manufactured by cynical governmental stakeholders, successful my view, successful this portion of the world, the narration betwixt civilisation and constitution has been an uneasy one. The crushed for this uneasiness could beryllium that governmental decolonisation — “independence” — did not pb to much-needed decolonisation of the Bharatiya psyche and consciousness. On the contrary, alongside the process of governmental decolonisation, the “independent” Indian authorities whitethorn person actively entrenched assemblage thought arsenic portion of its politico-constitutional model and everything other which is downstream of that. This continuity of thought and cognition from the coloniser to post-colonial India explains, successful galore ways, the tensions that animate the equation betwixt the civilisational individuality of the Indian subcontinent (not “South Asia”) and the Indian Constitution.
Simply put, successful autarkic India, assemblage condescension went connected to don the cloak of law morality whose intent has been to betterment the autochthonal individuality retired of its beingness with the assistance of allegedly immutable preambular values specified arsenic secularism. The nett effect has been that autarkic India has done much to sever itself from its roots than the coloniser’s ain systematic attempts astatine rendering it rootless. That this authorities of affairs is treated arsenic the continuing fulfilment of the imaginativeness of the framers of the Constitution and a information precedent for worldly prosperity tells the communicative of autarkic India’s self-perception. To adhd to this, immoderate speech of decolonisation is dubbed communal, exclusionary and anti-Constitution with renewed vows of fealty to the Constitution and its expected Basic Structure which, we are told, is present to enactment for eternity. We are besides told that the lone Constitutionally-compliant variant of nationalism that is acceptable is civic nationalism, which is founded connected secular civic values and allegiance to the Constitution.
For the involvement of this treatment and variety, it whitethorn assistance to instrumentality a measurement backmost from the supra cliches and inquire a fewer cardinal questions. The instauration of assemblage and its gathering blocks, adjacent if “imagined realities”, person existed for millennia and surely antedate modern law thought oregon the thought of civic nationalism. Contrary to “progressive” predictions and contempt the champion efforts of “global citizens”, religion, language, culture, civilisation and different specified markers of assemblage are precise overmuch live and kicking. Even decades of globalisation person not dulled specified instincts. Such being the case, is it realistic to anticipation that civic nationalism and constitutionalism volition prevail implicit these long-standing markers of individuality that person recovered greater acquisition successful the minds of communities? Even if a nine manages to regenerate these accepted markers of individuality with civic nationalism and constitutionalism, specified replacement would inevitably render the nine bereft of immoderate consciousness of self. It would render it susceptible to hostile takeover by groups whose consciousness of aforesaid is inactive beardown and remains comparatively untouched by pretentious affectations of cosmopolitanism.
Further, successful the discourse of the Indian subcontinent, replacing civilisational consciousness with civic nationalism and constitutionalism is bound to denude nine of that all-important constituent that keeps its endurance instincts intact and vigilance live — corporate representation and a consciousness of history. Perhaps, that is precisely the volition of those who bat for secular civic nationalism successful India. One request not look beyond present-day Bangladesh to recognize the consequences of humanities amnesia oregon the worth of community. Therefore, to spot a premium connected the Constitution implicit assemblage and civilisation is to pit oneself against the past of radical formation. In the aforesaid vein, to necktie down a nine for each clip to travel to a circumstantial mentation of the Constitution is to instrumentality distant the bureau of the contiguous and the aboriginal to trade their respective destinies successful a mode that preserves their consciousness of aforesaid portion remaining committed to the goals of constitutionalism.
The mistake that is often committed, particularly successful the Indian discourse is to presume that but for the Constitution, this state would descend into anarchy and would lucifer the monochromatic hellholes that are Pakistan and Bangladesh. It would assistance to carnivore successful caput that the beingness of a constitution has not prevented coups successful the neighbourhood, nor has it guaranteed the information and dignity of minorities. Given the sheer size, standard and diverseness of Bharat, what has distinguished Bharat from its neighbourhood is not the Constitution, but the innate dharmic barometer of its radical that preserves the pluralist cloth of the state and respect for its law institutions.
The writer is simply a commercialized and law litigator who practises arsenic a counsel earlier the Supreme Court of India, the High Court of Delhi, the NCLAT and the CCI. He is the writer of India that is Bharat: Coloniality, Civilisation, Constitution, and India, Bharat and Pakistan: The Constitutional Journey of a Sandwiched Civilisation