Delhi High Court refuses default bail to AAP leader Satyendar Jain’s co-accused in ED case 

The ED contended that the initiation of further investigations does not connote that the prosecution ailment was based connected incomplete findings. The bureau besides said the pendency of further probe does not trigger the close to default bail.

Justice Neena Bansal Krishna ruled that the prosecution ailment could not beryllium deemed incomplete, arsenic the probe regarding the committee of the offence was complete.

“In the contiguous case, the contents of the Complaint disclosed each the ingredients for the committee of an offence against the accused, and cognisance has besides been taken. It is evident that the investigations qua the accused for disclosing the committee of the offence are complete. There whitethorn beryllium supplementary investigations undertaken, but the learned Special Judge (of the proceedings court) has rightly observed that incidental oregon supportive investigations whitethorn continue, by mode of FSL report, which would not instrumentality distant the completeness of the Complaint in truthful overmuch arsenic the contents of the Complaint discloses each the ingredients for committee of offence,” the tribunal said.

The tribunal concluded that the prosecution ailment contained each indispensable elements for the committee of the offence and that immoderate further investigations were supplementary successful nature, frankincense not rendering the ailment incomplete.