The Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi (IIT-D) has earned the apical spot successful India successful the ‘QS World University Rankings: Asia 2025’, acknowledgment to improvements successful 8 indicators, astir prominently, unit with PhD, successful which it climbed by 58 places.
Meanwhile, the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB) got the 2nd spot. It remains the country’s astir well-renowned assemblage among planetary academics and employers, placing 27th successful world estimation and 16th successful leader reputation.
Regionally, IIT Delhi climbed to 44th fertile from 46th rank, taking the nationalist apical presumption and overtaking past year’s leader, IIT Bombay which slipped from 40th fertile to the 48th fertile regionally.
It is not conscionable IIT Bombay that has seen a decline, immoderate different apical varsities specified arsenic IIT Madras, IIT Kharagpur, IISc and IIT Kanpur besides observed a driblet successful their rankings. While IIT Bombay fell by 8 ranks, IIT Madras saw a driblet of 3 years (from 53 to 56 this year). The Indian Institute of Science (IISc) and IIT Kanpur saw a diminution of 4 ranks each arsenic IISc fell from 58 to 62 this twelvemonth and IIT-K fell from 63 to 67 this year. IIT Kharagpur, however, saw a diminution of lone 1 fertile arsenic she fell from 59 to 60th fertile this year.
2025 Rank | 2024 Rank | Institution |
44 | 46 | Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD) |
48 | 40 | Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB) |
56 | 53 | Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IITM) |
60 | 59 | Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IIT-KGP) |
62 | 58 | Indian Institute of Science |
67 | 63 | Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) |
81 | 94 | University of Delhi |
104 | 111 | Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IITG) |
108 | 116 | Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR) |
110 | 117 | Jawaharlal Nehru University |
120 | 149 | Chandigarh University |
148 | 218 | University of Petroleum and Energy Studies (UPES) |
150 | 163 | Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT) |
168 | 213 | Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences |
171 | 215 | Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani |
173 | 210 | Savitribai Phule Pune University |
177 | 179 | Anna University |
179 | 187 | University of Calcutta |
183 | 186 | Amity University |
188 | 206 | Jamia Millia Islamia |
197 | 210 | Manipal Academy of Higher Education – Manipal University (MAHE) |
The University of Delhi (DU) made a large leap of 13 ranks this twelvemonth arsenic the cardinal assemblage jumped from 94 past twelvemonth to 81 this year. IIT Guwahati, which ranked 104th regionally, earned the apical 8th spot successful India. The different 2 universities successful the apical 10 (India) are IIT Roorkee astatine the 108th spot regionally and Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) astatine the 110th fertile regionally.
Chandigarh University earned the 11th spot (120th rank), followed by University of Petroleum and Energy Studies (UPES) astatine 148th spot, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT) astatine 150th rank, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences astatine 168th fertile and Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS), Pilani sealed the apical 15 successful India with 171th fertile regionally.
University of Petroleum and Energy Studies (UPES) is Asia’s 2nd astir improved assemblage successful the ranking, climbing an awesome 70 positions to spot 148th. It has improved successful 9 of QS’ indicators.
As per the data, much Indian universities person seen an summation alternatively than a drop. This year, a full of 163 Indian universities participated successful QS rankings. Of these, 59 universities person climbed the table, 51 dropped successful ranks and 31 remained unchangeable successful their ranks oregon bands.
Indian universities person performed excellently successful estimation indicators, marking the country’s astir improved metrics. In world reputation, 75 per cent of its antecedently ranked universities person climbed portion successful leader reputation, 73 per cent climb.
Research productivity represents a large spot for Indian universities. Interestingly, of Asia’s apical 5 universities successful Papers per Faculty, 4 are Indian. Anna University has earned the determination 2nd rank.
Indian Universities successful Region’s Top 10 successful Papers Per Faculty | ||||
Overall Rank | Institution | Indicator Score | Indicator Rank | Indicator Change |
177 | Anna University | 100 | 2 | -1 |
521-540 | Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, West Bengal | 100 | 3 | -1 |
62 | Indian Institute of Science | 100 | 4 | 0 |
221 | Bharathiar University, Coimbatore | 99.8 | 5 | 1 |
104 | Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IITG) | 98.9 | 9 | 1 |
Interestingly, 8 Indian universities person tied successful 2nd spot successful ‘Staff with PhD’ category. These universities are IISc, IIT Madras, IIT Kharagpur, IIT Kanpur, IIT Ropar, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Design & Mfg Kancheepuram, IISER Bhopal and IIT Bhubaneswar.
Indian Universities Tied successful Second successful Staff with PhD | ||||
Overall Rank | Institution | Indicator Score | Indicator Rank | Indicator Change |
62 | Indian Institute of Science | 99.9 | 2 | -1 |
56 | Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IITM) | 99.9 | 2 | -1 |
60 | Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IIT-KGP) | 99.9 | 2 | -1 |
67 | Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) | 99.9 | 2 | -1 |
521-540 | Indian Institute of Technology Ropar | 99.9 | 2 | -1 |
701-750 | Indian Institute of Information Technology, Design & Mfg Kancheepuram | 99.9 | 2 | -1 |
501-520 | Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal | 99.9 | 2 | -1 |
421-430 | Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar | 99.9 | 2 | -1 |
Regionally, the apical 4 stay unchanged year-on-year. Peking University takes the highest rank, followed by The University of Hong Kong successful second. Singaporean institutions instrumentality 3rd and fourth, with the National University of Singapore (NUS) and Nanyang Technological University (NTU). China’s Fudan University climbs to fifth, usurping its home compatriot Tsinghua University, which drops to seventh.
QS World University Rankings: Asia 2025 – Top 10 | |||
2025 Rank | 2024 Rank | Institution | Country/Territory |
1 | 1 | Peking University | China (Mainland) |
2 | 2 | The University of Hong Kong | Hong Kong SAR |
3 | 3 | National University of Singapore (NUS) | Singapore |
4 | 4 | Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU) | Singapore |
5 | 7 | Fudan University | China (Mainland) |
6 | 10 | The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) | Hong Kong SAR |
7 | 4 | Tsinghua University | China (Mainland) |
8 | 6 | Zhejiang University | China (Mainland) |
9 | 8 | Yonsei University | South Korea |
10 | 17 | City University of Hong Kong | Hong Kong SAR |
“With the government’s unwavering committedness to advancing India’s presumption arsenic a planetary acquisition superpower , its dual absorption connected attracting planetary students and strengthening probe done planetary collaboration remains essential. The NEP 2020’s student-focused reforms, aiming to boost the Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) to 50% by 2035 — a 40% summation — item this commitment. Additionally, initiatives similar the Gujarat International Finance Tec-City (GIFT City), which enables overseas universities to found subdivision campuses with streamlined regulations, exemplify India’s readiness for planetary partnerships. Complementing these efforts, the broad field acceptable to beryllium established by the University of Southampton successful Gurugram underscores India’s thrust to grow its acquisition footprint and reenforce its planetary world ties,” said Dr Ashwin Fernandes, QS Executive Director for Africa, Middle East & South Asia.