Most controversial reality TV shows, from the problematic to super strange

Since reality TV began 76 years ago, determination has been an endless proviso of concepts to support america entertained.

Amongst them, we’ve had galore occurrence stories specified arsenic the longest-running world show Survivor and Big Brother, which has dispersed to 63 countries astir the world.

With a caller summation to the genre ever emerging, not everyone has been a hit.

While immoderate conscionable haven’t been capable to seizure their intended audience, others person pushed the boundaries truthful far, whether they should person existed successful the archetypal spot has been called into question.

Let’s instrumentality a look backmost astatine immoderate TV shows that apt wouldn’t beryllium made again today…

The British Tribe Next Door (2019)

Scarlett Moffatt’s TV amusement feels a small similar a fever imagination owed to its insane premise.

The Channel 4 show The British Tribe Next Door involved gathering a replica of the Gogglebox star’s Country Durham location successful Namibia and moving her household into the impermanent fixture for 1 month.

Joining Scarlett was her mum Betty, dada Mark, sister Ava-Grace and grandma Christine, who each packed up their 20,000 belongings for the travel to Africa.

At the time, the docu-reality bid was labelled arguable astatine best, and problematic oregon violative astatine worst. There were plentifulness of awkward moments specified arsenic a invited creation wherever the household seemed uncomfortable, and Scarlett talking astir her penchant for fake tanning to a radical of Black women. 

Fat Families (2010)

Families struggling with their value were sent assistance successful the signifier of Steve Miller, successful the Sky One creation. The self-titled ‘no-nonsense abdominous buster’ had an attack that was harsh, to accidental the least.

He threw insults astatine everyone, with remarks specified ‘merry munchers’ ‘beach blubber bellies’, and ‘fatties that haven’t seen their feet for years’ utilized without caution.

Those participating were enactment nether changeless surveillance arsenic their manner was overhauled. It would not beryllium antithetic for a shaper to telephone a subordinate if they saw them taking a interruption from the treadmill.

Supersize vs Superskinny (2008-2014)

In the 2000s and 2010s, determination were galore bid based connected weight. As good arsenic the aforementioned Fat Families, determination were You Are What You Eat, Secret Eaters, and Biggest Loser, and Channel 4’s Supersize vs Superskinny.

The second bid asked a idiosyncratic who was overweight, and an underweight idiosyncratic to unrecorded unneurotic for 5 days and swap diets. This would entail eating a drastically antithetic fare that they did not enjoy. Sometimes a idiosyncratic would lone beryllium fixed blistery beverages and snacks passim the day.

Although it was supervised by Dr Christian Jessen, it is improbable to person been the healthiest mode to code issues.

There’s Something About Miriam (2004)

The 2004 Sky amusement followed a radical of British men competing to triumph the affection of the precocious Mexican model Miriam Rivera, past 21, and a £10,000 currency prize.

Rivera, who was a trans woman, was told to support her gender identity concealed passim the bid until the last stage.

As the British Medical Journal explained: ‘The premise was not a solemnisation of transgender people’s lives. It was designed to elicit fearfulness from the winning contestant, discovering that his imagination day had a penis.’

The Swan (2004)

Presented by Irish big Amanda Byram, The Swan – based connected the fairytale The Ugly Duckling – chose a formed of women deemed to beryllium unattractive and suffering from debased self-esteem and gave them utmost makeovers, not conscionable with a container of hairsbreadth dye and a make-up artist, but with specially selected integrative surgeons.

The 16 selected women would each vie to marque it to the expansive pageant final, aired connected Fox.

‘A radical of mean women manus implicit their lives to a squad of cosmetic and integrative surgeons,’ a voiceover would explicate astatine the commencement of each episode.

‘They volition beryllium enactment done a brutal three-month makeover each for the accidental to go quality queens. Each week, 2 contestants volition beryllium transformed, but lone 1 volition beryllium judged beauteous capable to determination connected to the pageant.’

10 Years Younger (2004-2009, 2020)

The Swan wasn’t the lone bid that preyed connected people’s debased self-esteem and offered escaped integrative surgery. 10 Years Younger overhauled people’s quality with the purpose of their makeover signified successful the title.

At the commencement of the episode, 100 radical would conjecture the property of the participant, and the process would repeated erstwhile again aft the enactment had been done.

Once again the usage of cosmetic country arsenic a mode to hole issues, that were often internal, was criticised.

Benefits Street (2014)

The TV series, which ran for 2 seasons, followed the lives of Birmingham residents connected ‘one of Britain’s astir benefit-dependent streets’ including White Dee (real sanction Deidre Kelly), Samora Roberts who was known arsenic Black Dee, and James Clarke. It was claimed 95% of householders did not work.

The highly arguable Channel 4 amusement divided viewers, with galore claiming it gave those who assertion benefits an undeservedly atrocious reputation, demonising them in immoderate ways. So portion it was watched by 4.3 million, it besides led to hundreds of Ofcom complaints.

It besides enraged immoderate members of the nationalist by not highlighting the myriad of reasons radical whitethorn usage the authorities system. According to UK statistic astatine the time, little than 1% of families had 2 generations who were connected benefits that had ne'er worked. Fraudulent payment claims were adjacent less, with an approximate 0.8% of benefits being overpaid owed to suspected fraud. 

While Dee alleged they got no enactment aft filming, contempt the trolling: ‘When you speech astir enactment and aftercare determination simply wasn’t any.

‘There was nary enactment portion it was being made and determination was surely nary aftercare.’

Snog Marry Avoid? (2008-2013)

Billed arsenic giving makeunders alternatively of makeovers, BBC’s Snog Marry Avoid? invited radical into the POD, which stood for idiosyncratic overhaul device.

Originally presented by Jenny Frost, earlier Ellie Taylor took implicit the reboot, ‘OTT girls and boys’ would beryllium transformed into ‘natural beauties’.

The format would spot the participants archetypal perceive to what members of the nationalist thought of their appearance, which would regularly beryllium wholly negative. Then aft removing their makeup, they’d get a much demure, mindful and cutesy look. What would travel is affirmative comments from the public.

But really, who cares what different radical deliberation arsenic agelong arsenic the idiosyncratic themselves are blessed with however they look?

Also, the POD had existent Steve Miller vigor and ripped participants to shreds, which we’re not present for successful 2024.

Born successful the Wild (2015)

Born In The Wild saw large women determine to springiness commencement successful the Alaskan wilderness, 150 miles distant from the nearest hospital.

‘No inductions, nary epidural … conscionable expectant mothers facing and giving commencement successful the arms of Mother Nature,’ the Lifetime show’s statement teased.

Midwives joined the families, and determination was ever an ambulance nearby, but it was not made wholly wide what would hap if thing went importantly wrong. The jeopardy of the concern is played connected wrong the programme.

Adding further play to childbirth feels a small tone-deaf erstwhile truthful overmuch tin and has gone incorrect for women. Shows similar One Born Every Minute beryllium you don’t request to nonstop women to forests to marque the accomplishment of caller beingness interesting.

Who’s your Daddy? (2005)

The Fox bid signed up Myers, who was raised by adoptive parents and had ne'er met her biologic father.

Myers was introduced to 8 men, who could beryllium her estranged father. They each lived unneurotic successful a mansion arsenic she got to cognize each of them. If Myers guessed correctly, she would triumph $100,000, but if duped, they would instrumentality the money.

In 1 scene, an histrion tells an affectional Myers: ‘I privation you to cognize that you were conceived successful implicit love.’

The bid was ne'er finished aft it was slammed by adoption charities arsenic ‘destructive, insensitive and offensive’.

Kid Nation (2007)

Forty overachieving kids, aged betwixt 8-15, were near without adults oregon modern comforts, specified arsenic electricity, for 40 days.

During this time, they were told to physique a caller satellite retired of a real-life shade municipality that died successful the 19th century, arsenic good arsenic navigator and cleanable for themselves. They besides had to slumber connected the floor, and were lone capable to ablution each 3 days.

To instrumentality portion successful the CBS show, the formed were removed from schoolhouse for six weeks, with nary tutoring.

It’s since been claimed by the present grown-up children that producers would effort to promote arguments by telling them what others had said successful confessionals. It’s rather atrocious signifier erstwhile adults are involved, but is partially expected erstwhile filming world TV. However, wherever children are concerned, the manipulation feels wholly wrong.

I Wanna Marry Harry (2014)

Dating shows are perpetually trying to service america thing caller successful the crowded marketplace and Fox truly went for it with I Wanna Marry Harry.

They enactment a clump of American women into a location and told them they were dating Prince Harry, but it was alternatively a lookalike called Matthew Hicks.

Staged paparazzi chases, and regal dates kept the charade going but weren’t capable to enthral viewers – the bid was pulled halfway done airing.

Duping women to autumn successful emotion with a prevarication is simply a questionable ground for a series.

Got a story?

If you’ve got a personage story, video oregon pictures get successful interaction with the Metro.co.uk amusement squad by emailing america [email protected], calling 020 3615 2145 oregon by visiting our Submit Stuff leafage – we’d emotion to perceive from you.

MORE : Married At First Sight UK grooms exposure ‘epidemic’ among consecutive men

MORE : We were the past mates connected MAFS but took our wedding rings off

MORE : 00s TV fable stuns arsenic she shows disconnected unthinkable value nonaccomplishment successful swimwear