The role of constitution in shaping Indian and American democracies

The spot of these 2 divers antiauthoritarian systems lies successful their dependable and well-crafted constitutions, which service arsenic foundational documents for the functioning of each nation. Though the constitutions of the 2 countries person envisaged antithetic governmental systems, determination are immoderate similarities and definite cardinal differences.

India’s law design

The Indian constitution has designed a parliamentary ideology with a federal structure. There is simply a dual enforcement strategy successful place, with the Prime Minister, the de facto or existent executive, serving arsenic the caput of government, portion the President, the de jure or nominal executive, holds a ceremonial relation arsenic the caput of  state. 

A quasi-federal strategy that divides powers among the states and a beardown cardinal authorities was designed, with the states having nary powerfulness to secede from the union.

The Indian constitution grants the Union authorities each residuary powers, which is the powerfulness to marque laws connected immoderate substance not mentioned successful the Concurrent List oregon State List. 

The Indian constitution has created a steadfast synthesis of the American doctrine of judicial supremacy doctrine and the British doctrine of parliamentary supremacy. The apex tribunal of India tin workout its judicial reappraisal powers to state immoderate parliamentary instrumentality unconstitutional, portion Parliament has the powerfulness to amend the constitution arsenic agelong arsenic it does not contravene the basic structure of the constitution. 

US constitutional system

In contrast, the US constitution has framed a statesmanlike strategy of authorities with the President of the United States being some the de jure and de facto executive. This strategy employs the doctrine of separation of powers to abstracted the enforcement from the legislature,  giving important powers to the President arsenic caput of authorities and government. 

Further, the US constitution provides for a national strategy wherein the states person overmuch much autonomy vis-a-vis the national government. The residuary powers successful the US discourse rests with the states. In presumption of judicial review, the US constitution has established a strategy of judicial supremacy,  granting the Supreme Court the powerfulness to state immoderate instrumentality unconstitutional, ensuring a cheque connected the legislative branch. 

However, the US constitution requires a much stringent process for amendments, arsenic determination is nary equivalent to India’s basic operation doctrine. Amendments indispensable person a two-thirds bulk successful some houses of Congress and further ratification by three-quarters of the states in  the federation. This is the cardinal crushed that has resulted successful the US constitution having lone 27 amendments since its ratification successful 1787, portion the Indian constitution, with its much flexible amendment provisions, has been amended 106 times since its adoption successful 1949.

Other similarities  

Both these constitutions stock respective similarities portion besides exhibiting cardinal differences from  each different successful their halfway philosophies and mechanisms, beyond those mentioned earlier. India’s constituent assembly framed the constitution by borrowing the champion ideas from constitutions crossed the satellite and adapting them to India’s unsocial circumstances. 

Dr BR Ambedkar, the Chairman of the Constituent Assembly’s drafting committee, famously said that the Indian Constitution was designed by ‘ransacking each the known Constitutions of the World’. The US Constitution is 1 of the sources from which the constituent assembly was inspired. 

Important components of the Indian constitution specified arsenic the proviso for cardinal rights, the autarkic quality of the judicial system, judicial review, provisions for impeachment of the President and judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts, and the bureau of the Vice President  person each been adapted from the US constitution. 

And differences

While specified similarities exist, determination are besides important differences. The beingness of a robust multi-party strategy successful India is successful nonstop opposition to the mostly two-party strategy of the US. While the cardinal rights successful the Indian constitution encompass not lone extortion from authorities interference but besides beforehand societal and economical rights that the authorities indispensable promote, the US mentation chiefly focuses connected idiosyncratic freedoms and protections against authorities overreach. 

In the discourse of exigency powers, India has elaborate provisions for declaring a authorities of emergency, allowing the authorities to presume bonzer powers during crises. On the different hand, the US Constitution has nary ceremonial exigency provision, lone the suspension of definite rights  during warfare oregon insurrection. 

While some states are mostly national successful nature, India is simply a quasi federal, ‘indestructible national of destructible states’, portion the US is simply a existent federation, making it an ‘indestructible national of indestructible states.’ 

The judicial systems of the 2 countries besides connection overmuch contrast. India’s judiciary is unified, with the Supreme Court astatine its apex, followed by High Courts and subordinate courts. This hierarchy gives the Supreme Court the  last authorization connected each ineligible and law matters. 

On the different hand, the US constitution has enactment distant a dual strategy comprising some national and authorities courts, with each authorities operating its ain tribunal strategy to woody with matters regarding authorities law, alongside national courts that grip cases involving national law. 

The process of assignment of judges to the Supreme Courts besides varies. Judges of the Indian Supreme Court are appointed by the President based connected recommendations from the Prime Minister and a collegium of elder judges. In  the US, national judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. 

Contrasting secularisms 

India and the US are secular nations. But the quality and explanation of their ideas of secularism are different. The thought of secularism envisaged by the constitutions of the 2 countries is simply a nonstop reflection of their sociocultural realities and the humanities discourse successful which the documents were framed.  

The American conception of secularism, besides known arsenic ‘negative secularism’ establishes a implicit separation betwixt religion (the church) and the state. The authorities is indifferent and neutral towards each religions, and the authorities neither endorses nor discriminates against immoderate faith. Such a strategy was enactment successful spot to forestall the instauration of a theocratic authorities oregon the declaration of a authorities religion which were causes for large conflicts successful Europe astatine the time.

On the different hand, the conception of secularism enactment distant by the framers of the Indian Constitution is often described arsenic ‘positive secularism’. This thought takes into relationship the wide assortment of religions and cultures that beryllium successful India and avoids immoderate proviso that insists connected a strict separation betwixt authorities and religion. It lone ensures that the authorities does not uphold immoderate peculiar religion arsenic the official  religion of India. 

At the aforesaid time, the constitution grants each citizens and non-citizens assorted spiritual rights ensuring that the authorities gives adjacent respect to each religions and protects each religions equally. This unsocial mentation of secularism enables the Indian authorities to marque effectual interventions in  spiritual matters to uphold the rights of assorted communities and support societal order. 

In conclusion, contempt their differences, India and the US stock a committedness to antiauthoritarian values and the regularisation of law. While antithetic successful galore ways, their constitutions person provided the ground for the improvement of 2 vibrant democracies that proceed to signifier the planetary governmental landscape. As they navigate the challenges and opportunities of the 21st century, the oldest ideology and the largest ideology tin larn from each other. Their  constitutions volition undoubtedly play a important relation successful ensuring their continued occurrence arsenic antiauthoritarian societies.

Post Read Questions

How does the conception of the ‘basic structure’ of the Constitution interaction the narration betwixt the judiciary and the legislature successful India?

How does the powerfulness of judicial reappraisal successful India comparison to akin powers successful different antiauthoritarian systems, specified arsenic the United States?

What is the required bulk for a law amendment successful the United States, and however does it comparison to India’s amendment process?

How person the constitutions of India and the US contributed to the improvement of their respective democracies?

What does ‘positive secularism’ entail successful the Indian Constitution, and however does it disagree from antagonistic secularism?

(Doctoral campaigner successful Political Science astatine the Centre for Economic and Social Studies, Hyderabad)

Share your thoughts and ideas connected UPSC Special articles with ashiya.parveen@indianexpress.com.

Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and enactment updated with the quality cues from the past week.

Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and travel america on Instagram and X.