4 days ago
5
Abhishek Lodha (right) and Abhinandan Lodha (left). (Photos: lodhagroup.com and www.lodhaventures.com)
The Bombay High Court connected Monday suggested that the trademark quality betwixt Macrotech Developers—formerly Lodha Group—of Abhishek Lodha and his younger brother’s House of Abhinandan Lodha Estate Holdings Private Limited (HoABL) beryllium referred to a mediator. Abhishek and Abhinandan are sons of Maharashtra curate Mangal Prabhat Lodha.
A single-judge seat of Justice Arif S Doctor projected appointing a erstwhile main justness of India oregon anyone other (former judge) by the consent of the parties arsenic a mediator successful the case. He asked Abhishek Lodha’s counsel Janak Dwarkadas to respond connected Tuesday whether his lawsuit was consenting to effort to resoluteness the contented done mediation. The tribunal volition determine connected the assignment of a mediator during the proceeding connected Tuesday.
The precocious tribunal was proceeding an interim exertion by Macrotech seeking advertisement interim alleviation successful its trademark infringement suit to restrain HoABL from utilizing the “Lodha” trademark pending the proceeding of the matter.
“There appears to beryllium a quality betwixt 2 brothers. In each matters wherever determination is an constituent of quality wrong a family, the genesis appears to beryllium a quality betwixt 2 brothers. Has immoderate superior effort been made earlier you motorboat into protracted litigation? Has immoderate effort been made to beryllium down and resoluteness it? If a mediation oregon colony of quality is reached, won’t everything other beryllium enactment to an end?” the justice said.
Senior advocator Darius Khambata, representing Macrotech, argued that too the nonaccomplishment oregon harm provisionally estimated to beryllium much than Rs 5,000 crore owed to the usage of the “Lodha” by HoABL, the level purchasers of the steadfast were approaching Macrotech with complaints, suggesting determination was disorder among them regarding the trademark.
Senior advocator Dwarkadas said that respective attempts were made to resoluteness the matter, including an involution by the litigants’ parents arsenic they don’t “like to spot the dispute”. “Naturally so, and it volition further precipitate and truthful an effort tin beryllium made to guarantee that it does not happen,” the justice responded. He besides sought Dwarkadas’s effect to the proposition to name a mediator.
In 2015, Abhinandan parted ways with Lodha Group and started HoABL and the separation was formalised connected the ground of a household colony statement successful 2017.
Macrotech claims that owed to non-compliance with the 2017 agreement, a caller statement was signed betwixt the 2 parties successful December 2023, which expressly prohibited Abhinandan from utilizing a sanction akin to Lodha. Macrotech and Digirealty Technologies Pvt Ltd person sought a perpetual injunction against infringing connected their registered trademarks and from offering, selling, advertising, distributing, marketing, exhibiting for sale, oregon different dealing with impugned services oregon immoderate goods that are the aforesaid oregon akin to the plaintiffs’ goods and services that incorporate the people “Lodha”.
Through its interim application, Macrotech has sought urgent absorption to the steadfast owned by Abhinandan to halt utilizing the marque sanction pending the proceeding of the suit. The lawyers representing Abhinandan and his steadfast denied the claims made by his brother.
.png "indianexpress.")
.png "khaleejtimes")
.png "arabnews")
.png "gulfnews"){kind=logo}
English (US) · 
Hindi (IN) ·