2 hours ago
1
Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud said Thursday that the Constitution continues to beryllium applicable due to the fact that it is delicate to the changing needs of its constituents.
Delivering the M K Nambyar Memorial Lecture here, the CJI said, “Understanding of the Constitution arsenic a surviving papers immunodeficiency law courts successful knowing new, caller problems. It besides facilitates the Court successful uncovering a jurisprudential ground for solutions to existing societal problems.”
The CJI said that dissimilar India which follows the doctrine of a surviving constitution, the US goes by originalism which astatine its core, posits that the Constitution’s meaning is fixed and should beryllium interpreted based connected its archetypal knowing astatine the clip of its adoption, giving primacy to the purported intent of the framers.
This was disposable successful the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organisation, wherein the US Supreme Court “employed an originalist attack successful concluding that the close to termination is not explicitly mentioned successful the Constitution and, therefore, not protected”.
CJI Chandrachud said, “In this way, a rigid obsequence to the substance of the Constitution and the purported volition of the framers, though tempting, tin often effect successful a restrictive speechmaking of citizens’ rights.”
The CJI said, “No 2 generations are speechmaking the Constitution successful the aforesaid social, ineligible oregon economical context. No generation, including the present, tin person a monopoly implicit solutions oregon assurance successful its quality to foresee the future. As nine evolves, truthful indispensable the law doctrine. The institutions which the Constitution has created indispensable accommodate flexibly to conscionable the challenges successful a rapidly increasing cognition economy”.
He said that “besides subjectivity, the occupation with an unreasoned tethering with the framer’s intent is that it renders the Constitution susceptible to inflexibility. The Constitution was ne'er meant to beryllium a acceptable of iron-clad rules governing societal and ineligible relations. It was meant to beryllium a broader model of principles which would represent the bedrock of our caller governmental reality. Paradoxically, fixation with the archetypal intent of the framers is contrary to their ain vision”.
He said that “a blimpish speechmaking of the framers’ intent belies their foresight’ and it was ne'er their volition to fastener the provisions of our Constitution successful place, for eternity.”
.png "indianexpress.")
.png "khaleejtimes")
.png "arabnews")
.png "gulfnews"){kind=logo}
English (US) · 
Hindi (IN) ·