GREG GUTFELD: Trump voters expect deeds while Harris voters are fine with words

3 hours ago 1

NEWYou tin present perceive to Fox News articles!

You could not get a clearer contrast. And yet, determination volition beryllium those who perceive Harris and emotion it each spot arsenic overmuch arsenic you loved what you heard from Trump. So wherefore this large divide? Well, it has to bash with deeds and words. Trump voters expect deeds. Harris voters are good with words. A Trump supporter votes for Trump expecting him to act, but a Harris protagonist votes for Harris and that is the act. The enactment of voting is itself the argumentation and the point. Specifics don't matter. The ballot is the virtuousness signal, a elemental request with nary follow-up necessary. 

And that was by design, that the lone ground for voting for a Democrat, whether it was Biden oregon Harris, was that it was lone the ballot that mattered and that it beryllium against Trump. They tin virtually power candidates from 1 with dementia to different with bedewed brain. They conscionable expect you to ballot for them nary substance what. It's an anti-vote, an un-vote. The Harris voters volition propulsion the lever for Kamala and past recede backmost into their lives wherever the issues the remainder of america attraction astir are near ignored, whether it's amerciable immigration, rising crime, [or] the 20% summation successful nutrient and state prices. 

Because they've been convinced that nary of that matters but lone this one-time heroic ballot for Kamala. After all, she could beryllium the archetypal Black and Indian pistillate president to get america into a atomic war. For proof, perceive to MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle with a New York Times columnist aboard-- prioritizing a ballot for Harris implicit existent policies. 

BRET STEPHENS: It's not excessively overmuch to ask, Kamala, accidental are you for a Palestinian authorities if Hamas is going to tally that state?

BRET STEPHENS: Yes oregon no?

STEPHANIE RUHLE: And let's accidental you don't similar her answer. Are you going to ballot for Donald Trump? 

BRET STEPHENS: No, I'm not.

Bret Stephens Stephanie Ruhle

Bret Stephens and Stephanie Ruhle (Screenshot/HBO)

STEPHANIE RUHLE: Kamala Harris is not moving for perfect. She's moving against Trump. We person 2 choices. And truthful determination are immoderate things you mightiness not cognize her reply to. And successful 2024, dissimilar 2016, for a batch of the American people, we cognize precisely what Trump volition do, who helium is and the benignant of menace helium is to democracy. 

KAMALA HARRIS HIT FOR BEING VAGUE, DODGING QUESTIONS IN RECENT INTERVIEWS: ‘SHE OWES US THESE ANSWERS’

You know, I'd accidental she's dumber than a container of rocks, but astatine slightest you tin propulsion those astatine Brian Kilmeade. That's a strategy and it mightiness work. So however bash you transportation a Democrat elector that it's a mistake to enactment Kamala erstwhile they aren't adjacent funny successful issues? The lone counter-strategy is not to telephone them idiots; that's going to autumn connected deaf ears. Instead, direct their attention to those outlets who are telling them what to believe. 

For the champion mode to unravel a naive wide is to exposure the lies of those who provender them the lies-- meaning debunk the brainwasher. So adjacent clip you get a chance, simply inquire a Kamala supporter: Why not Trump? And erstwhile they telephone Trump a racist oregon sexist, which they will, beryllium prepared to debunk the lies, whether it's the good radical hoax, the drinking bleach hoax oregon immoderate lawfare. All it takes is 1 debunking to get them to deliberation that their media isn't giving them the full story. So you're not asking them to ballot for Trump, you're conscionable suggesting whether the accusation they're getting connected Trump is really, successful fact, trustworthy. 

CNN COMMENTATOR SLAMS HARRIS AFTER OPRAH WINFREY SIT-DOWN: ‘WHEN HAS SHE SAT DOWN WITH ANY HOSTILE MEDIA?’

It helps to punctual them that 85 to 90% of the media is pro-Kamala and anti-Trump, which tells them that erstwhile they judge they're listening to legit news, they're really being propagandized and brainwashed. That's the archetypal measurement retired of this bubble of blather. And next, if they're unfastened to it, inquire them to ticker those 2 interviews due to the fact that you simply cannot ticker some and locomotion distant thinking your media has been telling you the truth.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

And possibly that volition archer them not to fto those similar The View marque their decisions due to the fact that they'd person you voting for Harris and past celebrating with that triple bid of fettuccine Alfredo.

Greg Gutfeld presently serves arsenic big of Gutfeld! (weeknights, 11PM-12AM/ET) and co-host of cablegram news’ highest-rated programme The Five (weekdays, 5-6PM/ET). 

*** Disclaimer: This Article is auto-aggregated by a Rss Api Program and has not been created or edited by Nandigram Times

(Note: This is an unedited and auto-generated story from Syndicated News Rss Api. News.nandigramtimes.com Staff may not have modified or edited the content body.

Please visit the Source Website that deserves the credit and responsibility for creating this content.)

Watch Live | Source Article