11 hours ago
3
The tribunal volition perceive the petition that seeks a enactment connected the Morbi proceedings successful a little court. (File)
The Gujarat High Court Tuesday issued announcement to the authorities authorities and accused successful the Morbi Bridge illness case, seeking their effect to the petition of 1 of the victims who implored the tribunal to enactment the proceedings until M/s Ajanta Manufacturing Pvt Ltd was made an accused and the complaint of execution was invoked.
In an oral bid of the High Court, uploaded precocious connected Tuesday, the tribunal stated that the exertion “requires consideration” portion issuing announcement to the respondents, including the authorities government, and seeking a reply by January 6. On that day, the tribunal volition perceive the petition that seeks a enactment connected the Morbi proceedings successful a little court.
The azygous justice seat of Justice Sandeep Bhatt was proceeding the petition filed by Narendra Parmar, who had mislaid his girl Dhwani successful the calamity of October 30, 2022.
Through his advocator Utkarsh Dave, Parmar moved the Gujarat HC challenging the September 17 bid of the Principal Judge of Morbi, which had dismissed the exertion seeking further probe carried retired successful the Morbi Bridge tragedy.
The petition states that the Principal Sessions Judge of Morbi had rejected the exertion seeking the summation of Section 302 IPC and besides making Ajanta an accused connected grounds that the victims had “not undertaken immoderate workout successful consultation with the authorities authorities for obtaining support of the tribunal to prosecute backstage advocates” and backstage advocates “cannot marque submissions connected behalf of backstage persons” arsenic per the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, arsenic argued by the prosecution.
Parmar besides sought interim alleviation successful staying the proceedings until the HC petition is disposed of.
The petition adds that the proceedings tribunal dismissed the petition of the victims connected the grounds, stating that “there is not adjacent an iota of grounds connected record, which would amusement that the accused had intentionally committed the transgression enactment with the cognition that specified an enactment would, astir likely, origin death.”
.png "indianexpress.")
.png "khaleejtimes")
.png "arabnews")
.png "gulfnews"){kind=logo}
English (US) · 
Hindi (IN) ·