Socioeconomic determinants of rural poverty in India

Let’s analyse the contented of agrarian poorness successful India and find answers to questions similar what is agrarian poverty, however is it measured, and what accounts for its persistence. 

What is Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI)

The MPI, developed by Sabina Alkire and James Foster and adopted by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) successful 2010, measures deprivation crossed health, education, and modular of living, and not monetary poverty. 

National Institution for Transforming India (NITI Aayog), the apex nationalist argumentation think-tank of the Indian government, successful collaboration with the UNDP and Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI), developed a National Multidimensional Poverty Index to show multidimensional poorness astatine national, state, and territory levels successful the country. 

Multidimensional Poverty successful India

In January this year, NITI Aayog released a treatment paper titled Multidimensional Poverty successful India since 2005-06 which claims that the state has seen a important diminution successful multidimensional poorness from 29.17 per cent successful 2013-14 to 11.28 per cent successful 2022-23; and 24.82 crore radical person “escaped” multidimensional poverty. 

The treatment insubstantial sends a affirmative connection that India is connected its mode to execute Sustainable Development Goal 1.2 of “halving multidimensional poorness by 2030”. The insubstantial besides notes agrarian India has seen a larger diminution successful multidimensional poverty. Between 2015-16 and 2019-21, poorness successful agrarian India decreased from 32.59 per cent to 19.28 per cent, portion municipality poorness fell from 8.65 per cent to 5.27 per cent. 

However, NITI Aayog’s poorness projections person been questioned connected the grounds of a) the prime of indicators, b) methodological approach, which is besides referred to arsenic “an scale of work delivery”, c) reliance connected household survey data, and d) deficiency of caller poorness information arsenic poorness statistic haven’t been updated since July 2013.

Therefore, the accent has been connected the request for predominant poorness information to enactment much effectual agrarian argumentation improvement and poorness alleviation programmes.

Rural poverty: Disparities and deprivations

Rural poverty, which refers to poorness successful agrarian areas, is characterised by assorted factors including mediocre surviving conditions, dense reliance connected agriculture, landlessness and constricted entree to basal services. In addition, the agrarian mediocre are often affected by societal constraints stemming from caste, gender, and ethnicity, which tin bounds societal mobility and entree to opportunities.

For instance, the 2018 National Sample Survey (NSS) connected acquisition highlighted important disparities, with agrarian literacy astatine 73.5 per cent compared to 87.7 per cent successful municipality areas. Also, the 76th circular of the NSS underlined notable differences successful entree to basal services. About 29 per cent of agrarian households deficiency entree to toilets, successful opposition to astir 4 per cent successful municipality areas; and much than 40 per cent of agrarian households bash not person drinking h2o facilities wrong the home, compared to 20 per cent successful municipality areas. 

These statistic underline that knowing deprivation and multidimensional poorness successful India requires a position that goes beyond the data. Also, astir 65 per cent of India’s colonisation lives successful agrarian areas, but a disproportionately precocious percent – astir 90 per cent – of the nation’s mediocre reside successful agrarian areas. 

Other determinants 

The Periodic Labour Force Survey information shows that astir 59 per cent of the agrarian workers are engaged successful agriculture and allied activities. Among cultivation workers, determination is simply a disparity successful the incidence of poorness based connected whether a idiosyncratic is simply a cultivator oregon a casual wage worker. 

The incidence of poorness is overmuch higher among cultivation labourers than cultivators. For instance, arsenic of 2004-05, 21.5 per cent of the cultivators are mediocre portion 46.4 per cent of each cultivation casual workers are poor. Among the agrarian non-agricultural workers, the benignant of non-agricultural enactment is important. Self-employment successful non-farm enactment oregon precarious and casual non-farm enactment similar successful operation whitethorn not pb to poorness reduction. 

Another mode of knowing agrarian poorness is by looking astatine entree to onshore and onshore ownership. Data reveals that the tiny (1-2 hectares of land) and marginal (less than 1 hectare) farming households are the astir affected and mediocre groups. 

India is besides the lone state successful South Asia wherever poorness is importantly higher among female-headed households arsenic compared to male-headed households. Around 19.7 per cent of female-headed households are mediocre successful India portion 15.9 per cent of male-headed households are poor. 

Hence, on with determination factors, gender, caste, and religion are besides important determinants successful knowing poorness successful India. For instance, studies person recovered that some Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Castes successful India lend much to multidimensional poorness than their colonisation share.

Urbanisation of poverty

While agrarian poorness has been a persistent contented for Indian policymakers, the state has besides seen important rural-urban migration. As of 2020-21, astir one-third of India’s full colonisation is migrants. Migrants signifier 34.6% of the full colonisation successful municipality areas. This has led to increasing debates connected “urbanisation of poverty”. 

As migration to municipality centres grows, concerns astir housing, water, sanitation, health, education, livelihood, and societal information go important. Therefore, policies that prioritise health, nutrition, maternal health, and accessible aesculapian facilities are important for poorness simplification crossed agrarian and municipality areas. 

Given the analyzable quality of poorness successful India, which varies by state, region, caste, gender, and religion, it is wide that poorness cannot beryllium afloat understood oregon addressed without considering these spatial and societal dimensions.

Post Read Questions

What are immoderate cardinal characteristics of agrarian poorness successful India, and however does it disagree from municipality poverty?

What are the main critiques of NITI Aayog’s poorness projections, peculiarly concerning the prime of indicators?

What are the imaginable impacts of outdated poorness information connected knowing and addressing multidimensional poorness successful India?

How bash societal constraints related to caste, gender, and ethnicity interaction poorness successful agrarian areas and bounds societal mobility?

(Ritwika Patgiri is simply a doctoral campaigner astatine the Faculty of Economics successful South Asian University.)

Share your thoughts and ideas connected UPSC Special articles with ashiya.parveen@indianexpress.com.

Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and enactment updated with the quality cues from the past week.

Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and travel america on Instagram and X.