4 days ago
4
More than a decennary aft the crime, the Supreme Court connected Tuesday acquitted Chandrabhan Sanap. (Express Photo)
As the Supreme Court Tuesday acquitted Chandrabhan Sanap successful the rape-murder of a 23-year-old bundle technologist successful Mumbai, the victim’s household successful Hyderabad accidental they are present near with a question: “Who killed our girl then?”
“It is incredibly achy to spot the antheral who we were told caused her decease locomotion free,” the victim’s uncle told The Indian Express.
The victim’s uncle said that the household was unaware that the Supreme Court had been proceeding the lawsuit and learnt astir the acquittal done media reports.
“We had nary thought the accused had approached the Supreme Court. This morning, we saw connected the quality that helium is present a escaped man,” helium said.
“This determination feels similar an insult. We’ve endured truthful overmuch implicit the years, and present this. We were definite that justness would prevail,” the woman’s uncle added.
The bundle technologist from Hyderabad had gone missing aft alighting from a long-distance bid astatine Lokmanya Tilak Terminus (LTT) railway presumption connected January 5, 2014. She had returned to Mumbai aft spending Christmas with her parents successful Hyderabad. The constabulary arrested and booked Sanap astir 2 months later.
More than a decennary later, the Supreme Court connected Tuesday acquitted Sanap, who was sentenced to decease by little courts that recovered him blameworthy connected charges of rape, murder, and for causing disappearance of evidence.
Story continues beneath this ad
The victim’s uncle highlighted that the condemnation successful the little courts was based connected aggregate witnesses and important pieces of evidence.
“The little court’s judgement was made aft a thorough reappraisal of the evidence. We followed the proceedings closely, and erstwhile the Bombay High Court upheld the verdict, we believed justness had been served. We are shocked with the SC’s judgement which states that determination is insufficient evidence. Does this mean the little tribunal didn’t decently measure the case?” helium asked.
The techie’s uncle said that her begetter was “deeply affected” by the verdict.
“It feels similar they are reopening aged wounds. We’ve been surviving with this grief for truthful long, and present this ruling has made it consciousness arsenic though the symptom is caller again.”
Story continues beneath this ad
The household was yet to determine connected their aboriginal people of action.
Stating the justness has not been served for their loss, the victim’s uncle added: “We are precise sad. Very sad.”
© The Indian Express Pvt Ltd
.png "indianexpress.")
.png "khaleejtimes")
.png "arabnews")
.png "gulfnews"){kind=logo}
English (US) · 
Hindi (IN) ·